← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 48 (not an original page number)
Unit 48 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he Chinch; all these men were characterized by the firmness
of their convictions as well as their tolerance of and affection toward all
of Christ’s disciples. The concept of the “one universal Christian
Church” was a significant aspect of their thought. An interesting man
Holland
35
was J. Sinatra (d. 1800), an outstanding minister of the Waterlander
congregation in Harlingen, Friesland. The Reformed ministers, once they
had overcome the Remonstrants at the Synod of Dort, 1618-19,
demonstrated great concern for the orthodoxy of the Mennonite
ministers. Sinstra for example, was too latitudinarian for them, and
through their efforts they were instrumental in getting the authorities to
deny him the right to preach for many years! By 1757, however, such a
change in the climate of opinion had occurred that the Frisian provincial
legislature could persuade Sinstra to come to Leeu warden, the capital of
Friesland, so that the representatives could attend his services in the local
Mennonite church while the legislature was in session.
4. The Dutch Mennonites (Doopsgezinde) Today.
a) Today the Dutch Mennonite Churches are well ordered. They
number about 70,000 persons (members and children) with about 130
congregations and an equal number of pastors (called “teachers,
Praedikanten or Domines”). Despite considerable congregational in-
dependence, the congregations are nevertheless closely tied to one
another through mutual financial support, a common seminary and the
exchange of ministers, etc.
The first tentative and irregular education of a trained ministry
began in Amsterdam under the direction of Dr. de Haan and Jakob
Deknatel, among others, in the first half of the 18th century. The first
teachers at the seminary (at first only one, then two at the same time)
were the professors Niewenhuis (d. 1761), Osterbaan, Hesselink, R.
Koopmanns, L. Koopmanns, Samuel Mueller, de Hoof Scheffer (d. 1893),
and S. Hoekstra (d. 1898); in recent years, S. Cramer, and de Buissy
(doctors of theology). These men were also professors at the University
of Amsterdam, with which the seminary has been intimately associated
for a long time. Dutch Anabaptist students of theology may spend the
first three years studying at any Dutch university,— though most of
them study in Amsterdam, more particularly at the seminary there. Here
they are examined and accredited. The congregations, in accordance with
a longstanding policy openly arrived at, choose their ministers only from
the ranks of those thus accredited. These Dutch Anabaptist theologians
are highly regarded in the Protestant theological world (cf. further “e”
and §22, g).
The largest Anabaptist congregation of the Netherlands is located in
Amsterdam numbering some 10,000 persons of which over half are
baptized members (next to Chortitza in Southern Russia the largest and
most compact Mennonite congregation of the world), with 5(67) pastors.
There are also congregation
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…