← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 486 (not an original page number)
Unit 486 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
to
the point of self-destruction. That, in my view, is the most precious
monument to these men. That is the result of my (by that time) fifteen
years of delving into the past of our Russian Mennonitism. But
the brothers Kroeker (whose work I so much appreciate) could not know
all this about Brother Johann Claassen. I entreat you to deposit this
letter in the archives of the Kuban Church, just in case I am not able to
publish a biography of Claassen in the context of a history of the M.B.
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
503
Church. I heartily greet you and all those who love our Lord Jesus and
His Kingdom of grace and truth, and remain yours in ever constant respect-
ful love for you and your spiritual kin and fellow workers, P.M. Friesen.”
3. A view of the state and development in the Kuban area can be
derived from the reports of two itinerant preachers of this period (before
Daniel Fast’s ministry as elder and after Johann Claassen’s death). The
abridged reports are those of Abraham Unger, 1875, and Christian
Schmidt, 1876. We here abridge without use of quotation marks.
a) Brother Abraham Unger writes: "On October 23, 1875, I began
the journey [by train] of nine hundred versts to the Kuban Church
together with Brother Jacob Reimer of Blumenau and Brother Heinrich
Huebert of the Kuban. We arrived at Alexanderfeld on Sunday, October
26. We visited Br. Peter Berg and then went to church. We remained
there ten days, during which time we made twenty-three house
visitations and preached in six services. I made a special effort to visit
all the Old Colonists in their homes, which I considered my duty. But I
visited many others as well. I found what I had known in part earlier,
namely, that many of our people had joined the Friends of Jerusalem.
This happened through the influence of Heinrich Neufeld [see above
XXI, May 7, 1867, and Lepp’s corrections, #201(2 )] and the mad Johann
Friesen from Gnadenheim at the time they delivered the entire church to
the Devil, 302 with the result that the church was scattered, as when a
hawk descends upon little chicks. Mad foolishness! The Friends of
Jerusalem exploited this time of confusion to win many of our people for
their movement. But that was not the worst of it, for we know that there
are many honest individuals among them. Unfortunately many of them
had strayed so far from God that they no longer considered music and
dance to be sinful. Some have become sober again and want to return to
the church. The brethren H. Huebert and Daniel Fast take pains to lead
the church according to the teaching of the apostles and of Jesus Christ.
This is difficult because confidence in one another has been weakened
greatly by the dissension. But this may change little by little, if only
more of the erring ones find the right pathway and return to the church.
The brothers Jaeckel, Peter Gaede and Heinrich Neufeld with their
consorts are a special group, and therefore cannot hav
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…