← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 505 (not an original page number)
Unit 505 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
off, Tiege, Blumenort, Rosenort— Tiegerweide, Rueckenau— Kleefeld,
522
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§239
Alexanderkrone, Neukirch, Friedensruh, Elizabethtal, Alexandertal—
Pordenau— Grossweide, Pastva— Sparrau, Konteniusfeld— Waldheim,
Hierschau, Landskrone, Gnadental, Gnadenheim, Alexanderwohl —
Klippenfeld, Hamberg— Liebenau, Fuerstenau— Ladekopp, Muntau. The
brethren and sisters will also put forth renewed efforts (or find it a joy)
to read the reports of the itinerant ministers during the coming mission
year, and therewith also help to further the work of the Lord through
prayer and active involvement in giving, and then to send to each other
the reports according to the given schedule in order that the brethren
and sisters need not wait unnecessarily long for these blessings or be
robbed of them entirely. The dates of the receipt and forwarding of the
reports are entered on the last page. I would request that the reports be
returned to me after they have been read in Muntau. With fraternal
greeting according to Romans 12 from the 17th verse. Yours, united in
Christ, Philipp Isaak.”
In these note-books we find a long, interesting report by Brother
Kargel, at that time pastor of the Baptist Church in St. Petersburg— a
report which circulated among the Mennonite Brethren of the Molotschna
and Chortitza; the M.B. Church had the joy to support the worthy
preacher Kargel. At the meeting in Andreasfeld in 1874 plans were
already made to print the reports of the itinerant ministry, a step which,
however, was undertaken only after the appearance of the American
Zionsbote (1886-87).
C. Brief Statistical Report of the M.B. Conference in Russia
up to the 25th Anniversary, January 6, 1885.
A. Churches and Affiliated Churches (Divisions, Stations):
I. Molotschna— Divisions: 1) Puchtin (Gnieden-Blumenheim).
2) Crimea (Spat). 3) Herzenberg (Alexandrovka).
II. Einlage— Divisions: 1) Andreasfeld. 2) Wiesenfeld.
3) Jasykovo-Nikolaipol. 4) Grossfuerstenland (Sergeievka).
5) Burwalde. 6) Nepliuiev.
III. Kuban— Divisions: Turkestan (see "M.B. Churches in
Turkestan”).
IV. Friedensfeld and Sagradovka.
V. The M.B. Church at the “Mariopol Plan” and on the "Don
Side” (left the M.B. Church and joined the Baptist Union in
1886-87).
VI. The M.B. Church on the Volga: “Hahnsau” and “Popovka”
came to an end in 1880 either by emigration or by joining
the Baptist Union.
B. Membership of around 1800, including families of members, 4000.
C. Ordained— elders, 4; representatives of elders and ministers, 35;
deacons, 20; candidates, 20.
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
523
D. Meeting Houses 1) Rueckenau 2) Andreasfeld 3) Wiesenfeld
(School) 4) Nikolaifeld (Jasykovo) 5) Kuban 6) Friedensfeld
7) Sagradovka (Altenau).
E. Fellowship and Communion Groups according to the count of
the congregations and divisions: 17.
F. Children Worship Services, Sunday schools, as in E.
G. Annual Conference held: 13.
NB
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…