← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 507 (not an original page number)
Unit 507 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
hellenberg could recognize it as the will of God
to make a journey to visit the M.B. churches in America. Through the
preaching of the Word and through numerous blessed conversations, he
was able to be a blessing to many and experience bountiful blessings on
this journey. Similarly Br. Jakob Reimer made a journey to America in
order to work there in a blessed ministry for the Lord, and after him Br.
David Duerksen (18%) who found many opportunities to proclaim the
precious Gospel in power. Also, quite a number of journeys to Russian
Poland 317 were undertaken (see under M.B. Churches in Poland) and
two journeys to West and East Prussia by Jakob Jantz, elder of the
Friedensfeld congregations, and David Duerksen, now elder of the M.B.
Church of the Crimea, and everywhere the Gospel of the cross was
proclaimed abundantly.
5. The flourishing spiritual life of the churches was not spared
temptations. In the 1890s a renewed strong desire to acquire more land
became evident. These factors were accompanied by a decline of interest
for work in God’s kingdom and by a weakening of the efforts of
proclaiming the Gospel. “It need not have been this way if everything
could have occurred in the correct manner and many had not attempted
too much in terms of acquiring more property. Indeed, it sometimes
happens as Pastor Christen said in a sermon [to the Ohrloff
congregation]: Many sell their village farms and move into the country
in order finally to possess more land, too, but, instead of possessing the
land, the land takes possession of them. One should learn to say: Hands
off! Furthermore, the spirit of the times has taken a powerful hold of
many hearts: some aspire upward too much, have become involved in
factories and other business and suffer loss through such involvement.”
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
525
(Schellenberg). Not a little dishonor has been brought upon the cause of
God and the good name of the church through such dealings.
6. Much agitation in the churches arose regarding the question of §241
marriage, that is “whether members of the M.B. Church should be
permitted to marry non-members, without being excommunicated — or
according to the wording of the regulation— to be regarded as having left
the fellowship by entering into such a marriage. Since the inception of
the churches, when such marriages were rare occurrences, the rule
had arisen that when members were accepted into the fellowship
they promised not to enter into such unions. The discussions about this
matter caused some strife, since some heatedly pressed to have the regu-
lation dropped, whereas others could not understand how such a step
could ever be tolerated. So, for a while mutual trust was almost lost in
the brotherhood. However, at the annual convention of 1895, the majority
decided to drop the regulation and to examine each case individually and
act according to insight gained. The majority of the members of the
Molotschna c
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…