← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 510 (not an original page number)
Unit 510 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
enberg and Dyck (at the same time the
answer to the presentations from the province of Ekaterinoslav). In this
way God led the M.B. Church to a new stability in its rights, which had
come under attack either as a result of ignorance or ill will.
8. a) As far as the annual brotherhood consultations or conventions
are concerned, they are de jure (legally) simply extended brotherhood
meetings: e.g., the Molotschna or any other M.B. congregation
sets up from time to time, besides its customary brotherhood
meetings, such extended conventions for especially important questions
in order to preserve versatility and unity with the sister congregations.
The area congregation initiating such meetings requests representation
from the sister churches ; most of the congregations cooperate in sending
the requested delegates. The local congregation limits its number of
voting brethren to a small number and extends equality of re-
presentation to the sister congregations. It has been the custom in the
Mennonite churches from time immemorial to allow any approved elder,
minister, brother or sister of sister congregations to have this privilege in
the brotherhood, be their stay at such meetings of long or short duration.
(Cf. above 015 h and 063 “Cornelius Warkentin.”) According to law, the
local legally instituted elder is responsible for leadership. One or more
assistant leaders may be approved by the voting delegates of the
meeting. Upon reports of their delegates at regular congregational
meetings, all M.B. congregations discuss the decisions reached at these
brotherhood meetings and either approve or disapprove the action
taken. 322 The decisions accepted by all congregations become con-
stitutionally binding for the M.B. brotherhood. Maintained 323 and
explained in this way the internal affairs of the M.B. brotherhood in
Russia will receive no opposition from the Russian government so
impartial to foreign creeds (cf. XXV Claassen’s petition, etc.). In essence
§241(3)
528
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
the congregations of the Mennonite brotherhood follow the same pattern
in their local brotherhood meetings and at their general conference
sessions (in which the M.B. Church participates in general questions
such as school matters, and forestry service), b) Regarding “songfests’
one could simply say that they are Mennonite festive worship services in
song, and that they may be evaluated on the basis of the Mennonite
ecclesiastical organization and custom.
§242 9. The divisions (affiliates, stations) of the M.B. Church of
Rueckenau, Molotschna, in the most recent time (cf. above #229ff).
The center, the church of Rueckenau-Molotschna in the narrower
sense, in- the villages of the Molotschna volosts of Halbstadt and
Gnadenfeld falls into six groups according to places where meeting
houses are found: Rueckenau, Tiege, Tiegenhagen, Alexandertal,
Waldheim, and Sparrau. The religious leadership is found in the
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…