← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 513 (not an original page number)
Unit 513 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
er (Rueckenau) and David Duerksen (Margenau-
Schoental in the Crimea) as well as others who emerged from the
Molotschna congregations. In the M.B. Church of Einlage deep,
far-reaching changes occurred in the circle of the most influential
brethren. Br. A. Unger, influential even as non-active elder, died as we
know in 1880. Br. A. Lepp was getting on in years; Br. Johann Siemens,
influential for a long period of time in the whole conference as
outstanding itinerant minister, who because of his residence near the
elder in Andreasfeld as well as because of his energetic character became
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
531
the unofficial co-elder, died in 1890; Jakob Reimer (Wiesenfeld) became
older and more quiet and died in the year 1891. In the real church center
at Einlage sad spiritual-ethical circumstances arose, demanding dis-
ciplinary action by the church. These circumstances, which harmed and
brought deep sorrow to the whole congregation, greatly weakened
the well-known brother Johann Friesen, Sr., “Giver,” spiritual orator,
conference treasurer, committee chairman, friendly host, and loving
mediator between persons and parties within the congregation, pre-
maturely making him an invalid. Jakob Koslowsky, Sr., however (whom
we would like to call the “Philipp Isaak of Einlage”— in his—
Koslowsky ’s— good time), was, figuratively speaking, killed by the
sad state of affairs in the church and thus became impotent in work for
the cause of the church and God’s kingdom on earth. After the period of
storm and stress other converted men became active at the local church
as well as at the conference level. Included among these were the already
mentioned brethren Dietrich Klassen (deceased at Friedensfeld), Peter
Peters (later, Naumenko), Cornelius Fehr and Martin Koslowsky of
Jasykovo, Gerhard Siemens (Nepliuiev-Naumenko); Wilhelm Dyck
(Jasykov-Andreasfeld-Naumenko-Don), graduate of the Chortitza Secon-
dary School, formerly elementary school teacher and secretary of the
Nikolaipol Volost; Jakob Siemens (Jasykov) an influential member of
committees and conference treasurer following Johann Friesen, Sr.;
Herman Neufeld (Sergeievka-Ignatievka), for many years itinerant
preacher of the conference; of the older brethren, although not too old in
years, Cornelius Reimer, for many years active as secretary and member
of the conference committee, minister at Wiesenfeld (son of Jakob
Reimer— Gnadenfeld-Wiesenfeld, at one time fellow student of the author
at the Halbstadt Secondary School and in his early years elementary
school teacher, now founder and leader of the girls school in Gnadenfeld,
Molotschna) and others.
The period of the Einlage congregation dealt with at this time has
an anonymous reporter from the midst of the leadership of the M.B.
Church— someone who knows the brotherhood from its cradle as
“Mennonite” and who describes most of the Mennonite leaders at this
time as "Mennonite-pietistic” 325 in
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…