← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 515 (not an original page number)
Unit 515 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ute anything to
bringing the groups closer to each other; unfortunately, he did not have
the character of a reformer). In latter times, however, a greater spirit of
fellowship and approachability has been established towards Mennonite
believers.
b) If in this Mennonite movement much can now be understood in
terms of antipathy to the Baptists, much was human weakness and not
godliness, it is, nevertheless, certain that God did not wish that the M.B.
Church lose the good Mennonite qualities, but that these qualities be
revitalized and be translated into life, even as all good Baptist qualities
were to be accepted— as has been the case with all good qualities of all
Christian denominations according to the text: “prove all things, and hold
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
533
fast what is good”— “until we all attain to the unity of the faith and the
knowledge of the Son of God,” etc. The communication with the
Baptists, however, has not been cut off completely. The use of Baptist
literature, the Hamburg seminary— all missionaries of the M.B. Church
of Russia have been students at Hamburg— interchange of visiting
ministers between the Mennonite Brethren and Baptists— although all
too rare— as well as monetary contributions to the needs of the
Baptists— all these things, God be praised, have never ceased entirely.
c) The M.B. Church at Einlage cannot be exonerated from human
frailties and one-sidedness, but even so one cannot deny a striving
towards knowing and fulfilling of the will of God in many of its
members, particularly in most of its workers; in meeting with many of
these, the author has sensed deeply: “Here is the Holiness of God.”
Much faithful work to save souls, and to sanctify one’s own life unto the
Lord in body, soul, and spirit to build God’s kingdom according to the
best understanding, knowledge and insight, has been accomplished and
will bear fruit for eternity and receive eternal rewards. But the infallible
judge will have our wood, hay, and stubble destroyed by fire.
d) The external growth of the total congregation of Einlage
(1885 to the end of 1901), from the point of which the divisions of
Naumenko and Ignatievka began their own records and Kamenka-
Orenburg became independent churches (exact statistics are missing), is
marked by the acceptance of 1042 members by baptism in 17 years,
which amounts to an average of sixty-one per year (over against 30 per
year in the first 23 years).
e) The office of elder. At the end of the 90s Br. Martin Koslowsky
was especially designated as co-elder. In the year 1903 Br. Aron Lepp
retired. For too long the church had left the burden on his increasingly
weakening shoulders. Br. Gerhard Regehr (from Tiegerweide— Molot-
schna, graduate of Ohrloff Secondary School and the Halbstadt
pedagogical course, elementary school teacher for several years, living in
Reinfeld, Jasykovo, ordained as minister in 1895) was elected by the
church as his successor a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…