← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 540 (not an original page number)
Unit 540 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
stion. In a wonderful way the Lord provided in this regard.
A merchant owned a house at the end of the village of Kotliarevka. The
house measured seven and one-half by four fathoms. He offered to sell it
to the church. This was regarded as an answer to prayer. But where was
the congregation to obtain the necessary 1,000 rubles? That was the
second big question. Though the church did not have the necessary
resources, the Lord provided (through a loan from the building fund of
the Rueckenau Church; see H224). Thus, the house with one dessiatine of
land was purchased, and the building was furnished and dedicated in
that same year. The church rejoiced greatly and was thankful to the
Lord to own a building which they believed would be adequate since it
seated 400 persons. But the little group grew steadily, and with the
increase in numbers there was an increase in work, the more so because
there was no dearth of difficulties in the church. However, Jesus, the
good Shepherd, provided workers for the work. In 1888, Br. Jakob Wiens
(now of Tschunaievka, near Omsk) was confirmed as minister and the
brethren Aron Friesen and Heinrich Fehdrau as deacons. The Lord
visibly blessed the proclamation of the Gospel, locally and especially also
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
559
through ministers of sister-churches who occasionally came on visits to
the great joy of the church. Because the church increased year by year,
in number and in strength, it soon became apparent that the meeting
house was too small. Also the church had been informed by the local
authorities that they did not have government approval. Thus the
church agreed in 1892, having reached a membership of 213, to apply to
the government for the approval of a plan for a new meeting house. The
brethren Jakob Wiens and Jakob Braeul, who were commissioned to
represent the church, received a negative response together with a threat
that the present meeting place might be closed. This was a difficult time
for the church! However, the members sought to fortify themselves in
the prospect that even greater difficulty might strike them, convinced
that the Lord would carry forward the work which He had begun.
Considerable animosity was expressed against the church. Finally, in
November, 1896, the church building in Kotliarevka was closed by the
police. (See above, “Sagradovka.” What happened here was a part of the
same movement against those of other faiths as was the disruption of the
annual meeting of the church in Rueckenau in 1895, and the episode
regarding the Einlage Church. Cf. 0214 and 241, 2.) The church, whose
membership had reached 330, was required to meet for Sunday worship
in three different locations. Accompanied by much prayer and petition to
God, the church decided after much deliberation to ask the brethren
Isaak Fast and Jakob Braeul to present a new plan to the government
officials in Ekaterinoslav, with a renewed request to be permitted to
erec
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…