← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 553 (not an original page number)
Unit 553 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
n subjects, have trampled this
right under foot. One cannot hold back the question which rises from the
depths of the heart: ‘Why do they sit here, when their heart is still in
Berlin; why do they push themselves into our midst?’ ” Mr. Kamensky,
who in his aforementioned brochures energetically rejects as absolutely
groundless and dishonest the accusations which Mr. Velizyn and people
of similar persuasion have levelled against the German colonists, refers
§260
575
576
THE STATE
to a publication entitled, Unsere Kolonien, by A. Klaus, from which we
have repeatedly quoted. Klaus is, in Mr. Kamensky’s opinion, a
competent and non-partisan expert and critic of the colonists and the
Mennonites— and his book is a refutation of Velizyn. Kamensky throws
glaring light upon Velizyn’s injustice by citing (p. 13, op.cit.) several
passages from the book of a noted hero in the Crimean War, Mr. Alabin:
“The colonists are entirely satisfied with their lot; they love their new
fatherland as we its native children love it, and are ready, as we are, to
sacrifice everything they have for it. The colonists have proven this
during the present campaign [1854-1855]. Just cm enumeration of the
sacrifices which have been made by the colonists of Russia, particularly
the Mennonites, would make up a very telling page in the story of these
colonies. It would serve as living testimony of their love for Russia and
their sympathy for our great cause. I know from personal experience of
numerous such sacrifices. During our last march in the Crimea, we
moved from the Turkish border through many colonies and experienced
love and friendly co-operation everywhere; nowhere did we have any
negative encounters with the inhabitants; not a single incident took
place which spoke other than favorably of the colonists .... During our
march we camped out for the most part and naturally ate from the camp
kettle; but the field hospital personnel, the various military staff, the
convoy— filled the villages [colonies]. Under no circumstances did the
colonists even permit their occupants to cook porridge for themselves.
They fed the soldiers and, beyond that, provided them with a soft piece
of bread or cake for the journey. Naturally this pleased the soldiers a
great deal since their teeth had become dull, as it were, from eating dry,
roasted bread (‘Ssuchari’).
“From Aleschki we conducted marches which dear father Suvorov
himself would hardly have allowed his soldiers to make! The
circumstances of war demanded that we move on quickly— very few of
our people lived in the Crimea, especially in Sevastopol. We did not
enjoy a single overnight camp all the way from the Dnieper to the
Tschornaia Rietschka, except in Perekop where we were given
opportunity to catch our breath. We arrived at the station, ate our
porridge, and moved on again. Concerning the details of this perhaps
unprecedented march we will speak later. At this point, I simply wa
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…