← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 567 (not an original page number)
Unit 567 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
on to culture, but there they come under
the influence of culture before they really know or want it; we, here,
receive impetus for new life from this fresh air. The spiritual tension
which will exist between there and here, will give birth to religious
warmth. That is indeed how things developed. They experienced an
unexpected religious freshness over there and in turn influenced the
Mennonites of Russia. Much of what earlier was characteristic of the
“Brethren Church” and perhaps of Gnadenfeld and Ohrloff, became the
common experience of Mennonites in both Russia and America. These
men: Sudermann, Peters, etc., understood and desired nothing of Russia
except its abundantly fertile soil and its Tsar as an eminent abstraction
who was real for them only in the sense of being the author and protector
of the “Great Charter of Privileges.” Naturally, they were prepared to
give the required legal “tribute, tax and toll” and perhaps, in case of an
emergency, a “charitable donation” for their altogether strange and
distant fellow countrymen. They do not, nor were they capable of
appreciating the Tsar’s enormous efforts on behalf of his people—
particularly also, in the creation of the new military law 20 and all that it
entails, which, in the lengthy footnote above, we have described as a
Military Service and Emigration
593
relatively evangelical step forward. Nor did they even think of meeting
the needs or sympathizing with the trials of this people. They were not
only extreme Mennonites; they were also “Germans” in the measure and
manner of that German-Russian, gray -haired Lutheran pastor who
assured the author that he could not be a truly evangelical preacher if he
were convinced that the gospel could be preached and the Christian life
nurtured equally well in the Russian, as in the German language! The
pious, rather well-educated (but exclusively German educated) Elder
Sudermann said to Governor-General Kozebue from New-Russia: “Those
of our young people who attend Russian institutions of higher learning
are lost.” This incident took place during negotiations between the
Supervisory Commission and the Governor-General at Odessa in 1869 on
the occasion of the “Alexander stipends” which were established by the
Mennonites at the instigation of the above mentioned authorities. The
stipends (two from the Molotschna and one from Chortitza) were to
assist young Mennonites who were seeking education at Russian
secondary schools. Subsequent developments have proven the beloved,
honorable bishop to be in error. American Mennonite brothers admit that
it is far more difficult to keep their young men within the brotherhood in
America than it was in Russia. At least this has been personally
expressed to the author by several American Mennonite minis ters and
elders who have returned to Russia as visitors and by a number of
Russian Mennonite ministers and elders who travelled over there and
have returned. The num
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…