← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 590 (not an original page number)
Unit 590 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the owner.) 6. A refusal of declaration brings with it
the loss of appeal rights for the assessment of the commission which
assessment has, in such a case, become mandatory. 6. In the case of
willful concealment additional payments to the treasury are to be
extracted from the assets in question for the entire demonstrable period
of time and that at twice the quota amount of the current year. 7. The
annual assessment takes place during the month of October and serves
as a base for the taxation of the ensuing year. 8. The property owner (or
its trustee) is to comply with the mandatory assessment after receiving
notification from the assessment commission. 9. In order to facilitate
assessment the Mennonite population of Russia has been divided into
assessment districts. (These, in turn, have been divided into assessment
groups where necessary.) 10. Geographic proximity is the basis for group
divisions. Groups which live close together or have common
administrative ties form a district. 11. The assessment districts are
determined by the general assembly of delegates; assessment groups are
Military Service and Emigration
617
determined by the local district administration. 12. Each assessment
group elects an assessment committee from its ranks. This committee is
appropriately to list the assets of the group according to instructions and
to deliver this list to the district government. 13. Lists for properties will
be prepared according to format determined by the general assembly of
delegates. 14. Each assessment district (which is represented by the
group commission) elects seven persons from its own membership to
form the district governing body. 15. Each assessment commission elects
a chairman from its membership. 16. The district governing body has the
responsibility of collecting the group lists, making certain that the
assessments are made as fairly and uniformly as possible and that the
lists are sent to the authorized representative. 17. Each district must
defray whatever assessment costs may be incurred. 18. Personal reports
which are made before the assessment commission, being made
confidentially, will be held in strict confidence. 19. In order to facilitate
leadership in the total assessment operation the authorized representa-
tive is given an assistant who is called the assessment commissioner.
This assistant is appointed and salaried by the general assembly of
delegates. 20. The assessment commissioner’s duties are: to examine the
assessment work of the commission, to set up investigations concerning
the same, to see if some taxable Mennonite people have been omitted
from the list and to see to it that assessment is made uniformly in the
various districts (for which purpose he is to visit the districts personally
as often as possible). 21. Grievances may be registered with: (a) the
district governing body, (b) the authorized representative, (c) the
assembly of delegates. 22. The assessm
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…