← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 599 (not an original page number)
Unit 599 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
n a trip of these
men to St. Petersburg, and later to a consultation of all
church-administrative councils of the Molotschna (of the older
Mennonite, as well as of the M.B. and Evangelical M.B. congregations—
see below) in Alexanderwohl on February 7, 1908 (and other consultative
meetings). The nature of the legislative project and the position taken by
the Alexanderwohl assembly and all other Mennonite consultations is
seen in the following resolution, which was accepted eventually by all
other Mennonite church groups of Russia in various gatherings. As a
result of this document and its consequences, and for other reasons,
various statutes were added which are given in #293 and 294. We present
the document of February 7, 1908, in translation.
630
MATTERS OF FAITH
§293 A. "The Position of the Mennonites with regard to the Question of
Freedom of Faith and Propaganda.
"I. a) With regard to the question of freedom of conscience, as far as
it relates specifically to the Mennonites, we have no other desire than
that this freedom, which we have enjoyed in Russia for more than 100
years, also be granted to us in the future.
“b) In the code of laws, Vol. XI, Part 1, Division 3, articles 1104 and
1105, the Mennonites are listed together with other Protestant
denominations, which implies that in the law Mennonites are recognized
as a Protestant denomination or ‘fellowship’ like the Reformed or other
Protestants, and are not considered to be a sect; in the projected
legislation, however, which has been presented in the Imperial Duma by
the Minister of the Interior, we are designated as such. Any restriction of
the rights hitherto granted unto us would inhibit the sound development
of spiritual, moral and congregational life.
“II. Christ’s command: ‘Go therefore and make disciples of all
nations,” etc., we understand to mean that every Christian is obligated
to spread the truth of the Christian faith, or, in other words, to preach
the Gospel to all nations. We believe firmly in the power of the Word of
God, according to the statement of the Apostle Paul, Romans 1:16: ‘For
I am not ashamed of the Gospel: it is the power of God for salvation to
everyone who has faith.’
“III. However, we abstain from any active propaganda among
members of other Christian denominations, whether this is understood as
imposing our distinctive teachings on others (in order to lure such into
our fellowship), or as agitating by extolling our teaching at the expense
of other Christian teachings, coupled with a defamation of the latter.
“IV. We are deeply convinced of the truth that only the free
proclamation of the Gospel in its original simplicity and purity is able not
only to enlighten man unto eternal life, but also to bring about the
blessed new order of the civic life, so keenly desired by all of us, and to
establish immovably the All-Russian throne, ordained of God, as it is
stated in I Timothy 4:8: ‘godliness is of val
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…