← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 602 (not an original page number)
Unit 602 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Protestant confession (see note to Article 779) constitute,
in a certain sense, a common Protestant denomination in the eyes of the
lawgiver. This is also implied in the general caption of Book II, Part 1,
Vol. XI. (The statute on Ecclesiastical Affairs of foreign denominations.)
“To count our communion (with basically Protestant views and rites)
among the new sects, which have seceded from the Orthodox Church,
would impose upon us entirely new and strange forms of church life.
Preservation of Independence
633
These would be contrary to the ‘church regulations and customs’ on the
basis of which we have lived for centuries (even prior to Menno Simons,
who died in 1559, and from whom we derive our present name) in foreign
countries, and for more than one hundred years in Russia (since 1789).
Only on the basis of the solemn promise of the inviolability of the
absolute independence in our church life ‘for eternal times’ through the
great Tsarina (an independence which has, until this day, been
graciously, sacredly and faithfully guarded by all Russian tsars) have
our fathers entrusted themselves to the protection of Russian suzerainty.
As a so-called, United Old-Evangelical, ‘Mennonite Brotherhood’ with
its church leadership (the spiritual ministers, Article 1105), our ancestors
have come into the new fatherland. From this Brotherhood, on the basis
of the one imperial law which applies to us, and based on the one (in
essence) Old-Evangelical confession of the faith, new congregations
(brotherhoods, church-parishes) are established, with the same common
church rights and with an uninterrupted spiritual leadership, elected
‘from the body of the fellowship’ or brotherhood through its members
and confirmed by the (church) elders [presbyters].
“With regard to government recognition of our church leaders, which
is referred to in the projected legislation of the Minister of the Interior,
we desire to abide by the ‘Rules of our Confession’ as practiced until
this day. Until now the respective authority has only demanded
information 10 about those church officials who have kept the church
records. Until this day the government has not interfered in any other
aspect of the internal ecclesiastical affairs of our church fellowship.
“B. The Church Leaders of the Mennonites
“Our church leaders are not called in a superficial manner. They are
first of all elected by the respective congregation (brotherhood, church
parish) in a solemn manner, with prayer, as they meet in their place of
worship. They are chosen from the ranks of such persons who have
demonstrated their Christian character in word and conduct, and who
also possess the necessary knowledge of Christian doctrine, as well as the
gift of instruction. This general knowledge is acquired by them in
attending various types of schools, both on the lower and higher level.
However, the doctrines of faith are mainly learned in the ‘bosom of the
fellowship,’ in
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…