← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 608 (not an original page number)
Unit 608 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
tc., the ministers, if necessary, act as
representatives of the elders; and 3) the ‘deacons’ or ministers at
matters of church-stewardship and public welfare.
“To the articles 14 and 18.
1. Persons who through the holy ordinances have been accepted as
prescribed by the Mennonite evangelical doctrine of faith are considered
to be church members.
2. Children of church members who have been entered into the birth
register of the congregation are considered as ‘adherents of the church’
(standing under spiritual watch-care and instruction-catechumens) and
receive full membership only through admission in the prescribed order
as given in point one.
3. Membership is lost: a) through a declaration of voluntary
withdrawal from the congregation; b) through excommunication on the
basis of church discipline, until such time as the one rebuked will mend
his ways.
4. The age-level at which members are given the right to participate
in the brotherly deliberations of an ecclesiastical-spiritual or ecclesiastical
administrative nature, every congregation determines according to its
regulations and custom.
5. As representatives of the church before the authorities or in other
affairs of the church, members are elected who are not under twenty-five
years of age.
“To the articles 15, 16, 17.
“The brotherhood meetings pertaining to all church-administrative
questions are called, whenever necessary, by the elder or his
representative, according to the present traditional Mennonite practice.
These deliberative assemblies, called according to the established order,
are legal, regardless of the number of participants. All questions are
decided by a definite majority of members present.
"To article 3. Concerning religious communions. The Mennonites
would prefer to substitute the designation ‘fellowship’ for ‘society’
since the former is more in keeping with the congregational and spiritual
linguistic pattern of the existing translations of the Holy Scriptures.
640
MATTERS OF FAITH
[Here it should be mentioned that, upon the investigations of
several conference-members of the Conference in Schoensee, the
‘Children’s Worship Services’ 23 have also been incorporated into the
list of ‘wishes.’]
II
■‘Concerning Church-Registers” (Project)
“To His High Excellency, the Minister of the Interior, through the
Department of Ecclesiastical Affairs.
“From the General Conference of Mennonite Churches in Russia,
October, 1910, at Schoensee, District of Berdiansk, Province of Taurida.
“Most Humble Submission
"In March of this year the authorized representatives of our
churches— the Church-Elder Abraham Goerz and the Ministers Heinrich
Braun and David Epp— presented themselves to the director of the
department for Ecclesiastical Affairs of foreign denominations in matters
related to church-registers in Mennonite congregations. Two copies of
our church-registers were presented to the Director at that time. It
becam
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…