← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 614 (not an original page number)
Unit 614 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
lly
left in the pews, and was not called upon to preach! Some of the
brethren of the Mennonite Church have displayed an admirable
meekness and humility. (We talk about that which we— as members of the
§297
646
MATTERS OF FAITH
M.B. Church have witnessed with boiling blood and burning brain. This
sin of the M.B. Church, too, must be named in a truthful history. We
have granted the M.B. Church the great right, in its origination and
continuation, of being a Mennonite communion and have established this
thoroughly on the basis of the documents. Not only have we presented
the great triumphs over its ecclesio-political opponents, but also— and
this is even more important— we have incontrovertibly documented its
triumphs over the ailments of its childhood days. For this reason we have
of necessity devoted a vast space to it in our book, and also generously
shown our love and appreciation. But we love and appreciate our
brethren in the older Mennonite congregations just as much; [especially
the determined believers and honest seekers after God] and every
injustice which is perpetrated by the “brethren” against them arouses
our indignation as much as that which they experience from the
Mennonites. But— to the concerns of today.) To the “General
Conferences,” as well as to the meetings of the local conventions, the
“brethren” had to be invited and had to come, as a consequence of their
inviolable legal status as Mennonites, their common enjoyment and
obligatory or voluntary participation in the achievements and sacrifices
in the forestry service, in schools, and in matters of public welfare.
Gradually the representatives of the M.B. congregations, especially the
younger generation, learned to conduct themselves in a more objective
and brotherly fashion. The invitations and participations mentioned
were, as already emphasized, occasional and irregular. The consultative
body, formerly designated as the General Conference (Bundes-Konferenz),
was re-named several years ago as “the General Conference of the
Mennonite Ministry in Russia.” At one of the former sessions, 27 the
question was raised by one of the conference participants whether the
title “General Conference” was justified, since the large M.B. Church
was not represented (in a regular manner, often not at all), and it was
decided to extend a regular invitation. Thus, numerous representatives
of the M.B. congregations came to the recently concluded General
Mennonite Conference (of 1910). Approximately one-third of all
participants were “brethren,” the honorable conference chairman informs
us. The leadership of the M.B. congregations was well represented from
the Rueckenau-Molotschna, Einlage (District of Chortitza), Kuban,
Ignatievo, Zagradovka, Memrik congregations, etc., etc. The represen-
tatives were formally authorized by resolutions of the congregations
which were presented to the Ministry of the Interior (with the request
and approval of t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…