← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 62 (not an original page number)
Unit 62 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ven “church convocation,” and
“church system.” The "brotherhood,” however, is the final authority,
the real sovereign law-making body, and is called according as need
arises, usually by the elder or his representative, and consists of all the
mature male members of the individual congregations under the
leadership of the church council. By majority vote the “brotherhood”
decides, in the final analysis, all important financial matters, the
excommunication of erring and readmission of penitent members,
matters of dogma and church governance, and the acceptance or
rejection of the church council’s resolutions or those adopted by a
conference of the various church councils and representatives of the
conference congregations. The brotherhood elects its elders, teachers and
deacons (usually through secret ballot given to the appropriate preachers
in the “preacher’s room” or “Ohmstube”). The candidates are either
recommended by the council or else the congregation votes without any
previous slate of candidates. The elder— and the others nearly without
exception— is invariably elected from the ranks of the preachers, who are
essentially candidates for the position of elder and substitutes without
full power. 32
b) The “minister” (“teacher") of the “old” Mennonite Church
congregations in Russia, by a general conference resolution of 1898, was,
in principle, granted the right to perform all official functions at the
desire of the congregation. In contrast, the M.B. Church, from the very
beginning of its existence, ordained its “teachers” as well as deacons,
and thus all the deacons as well as the ministers are enabled, in the case
of need and by special appointment, to perform all official functions. The
"elder” in the Mennonite Brethren Church, even though very influential
and honored, is set off from the rest of the ministers only by the fact that
he is the permanent presiding officer at all functions and has the power
to ordain, while the other ministers perform these two functions only at
the behest of the elder and the congregation. The differentiation between
the "elder” and the “teachers” or the "ministers” in the M.B. Church is
merely a practical matter with regard to church order: all ministers are
co-elders, 33 while the elder is the presiding, that is, leading minister.
52
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
This arrangement, as well as the practice of ordination, is not a matter of
faith, as some Protestants (Anglicans) would have us believe. In this
way the ancient Anabaptist-evangelical practice has been reinstituted by
us. The “Frisian” confession of faith makes no distinction between
“elder” and “teacher,” and in the article dealing with deacons Romans
12:7-9 is quoted verbatim, thereby establishing that deacons play a role
in the teaching function of the church. The Gnadenfeld and Alexander-
wohl congregations of Russia still ordain the ministers (assistants to the
elders) through the laying on of
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…