← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 68 (not an original page number)
Unit 68 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
f the
18th century. Wiebe’s memoirs span the years 1778 to 1796, during which
time he was the elder of the congregation. According to our source, he
was the author of a widely read confession of faith consisting of some 20
articles, probably the “Flemish” confession. He presents the following
data, drawn from the original documents, concerning the existence of his
congregation. In 1685 Hans von Koeln and Jost von Kampen are named
as Mennonite inhabitants of Elbing. In 1641 a von Kampen received
permission from the city to operate a small retail silk goods shop ; many
Mennonites became citizens. In 1660 the Mennonites were granted
permission to build a church and organize a regular congregation. The
church was small, however, since it did not have its own elder and had to
be served by one from the lowlands (Danzig?) until 1726, when it received
one from its own midst. The honorable Wiebe was ordained in 1778 by
the honorable C. Regier of Heubuden [probably the one who died in
Chortitza, cf. X, Appendix: Cornelius Warkentin], The rural and urban
brothers made up the congregations. In 1783 the congregation built a
second church in the country: in the “Ellerwalde” [Erlenwald]. The
congregation became large: in 1788 there were 468 rural and 156 urban
co mmun icants. Under Elder Wiebe the baptismal instruction consisted in
a short study of the catechism. The young people are “presented” for
acceptance in the congregation by two witnesses [ as happens in most of
the congregations of our Russian Mennonite brotherhood, and because a
"testimonial” is required from brothers and sisters of every person
requesting admission to the Mennonite Church. The old post-apostolic
church proceeded in a similar manner in the case of catechumen— bap-
tismal candidates]. The confession of faith is read aloud before holy
baptism [in the Mennonite Church here in Russia one speaks of "reading
the articles aloud”]; the baptismal act itself is carried out on the day of
Pentecost. When the weather is good guests come to witness the
baptismal ceremony from the nearby sister-congregation of Rosenort.
Elder Wiebe notes the name of every person baptized and appends a
good wish for the baptizands at the end of each year’s group in the
church register. What a beautiful custom! At one point he notes that a
baptismal candidate was kept back from baptism because of ignorance
concerning religious matters and a worldly life, and admonished to mend
his ways. Of interest in regard to church matters is the following
incident: A Mrs. Hamm, nee Boldt, a Lutheran, married a member of a
Mennonite congregation. Her husband, H amm , was immediately ex-
communicated, but very soon desired with all his heart to be readmitted,
along with his wife. His wife, however, had to be granted permission from
the government to do so. This document states: “After I informed the
honorable royal West Prussian government of the desire of Anna
60
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABA
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…