← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 70 (not an original page number)
Unit 70 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
man has to come before
the leadership because his wife has beaten their maid, a member of the
Prussia
61
congregation. The man admits that his wife reaches “the end of her
rope” rather quickly, on the other hand, however, the maid is not very
obedient; yet such conduct shall not be repeated in the future. The girl,
however, did not want to return to the family. Blood brothers not only
quarreled but also fought over the division of inherited furniture. Other
brothers do not keep their word in money matters and are therefore
refused access to the co mmuni on table. Unhappy marriages create
problems: one wife runs away from her husband and does not want to
return to him. With much patience and effort the ministers are able to
reconcile the couple. Another wife tells the leadership that she was
matched with her husband. After much effort even this case is resolved.
A young sister has become engaged to a Lutheran organist. After serious
consideration her Mennonite conscience is sensitized; she turns to the
leadership for counsel. At first she is refused access to the communion
table; after she has broken the relationship and begged earnestly to be
readmitted she is again accorded full membership. Another brother is
summarily excommunicated because he has married a sister of the
Thiensdorf [Frisian] congregation! Soon his wife dies, now he wants to
marry within the circle of his old congregation; “upon confession of guilt
[!] and request for forgiveness” he is reinstated. An instance from
another congregation is recorded where a man married his deceased
wife’s sister, is excommunicated, but then finally reinstated “through a
vote of the brethren.” This occasioned the calling of a conference of the
elders of Danzig, Elbing, Heubuden, and Grosswerder on June 14, 1781.
A resolution is passed that all marriages not allowed in Leviticus,
chapters 18 and 20, are to be punished with perpetual excommunication [!].
Instances of severe immorality also dishonor the congregation and fill
the hearts of the devout with anxious worries. The secular life: dancing,
bowling, the drinking of hard liquor etc., lead to special meetings of the
elders and teachers with the hope of curtailing such practices. [Nothing
new under the sun!] We notice, however, that the leadership is alert to
its duties [even though one may perhaps observe that they are guilty of
too much “congregational order” and not enough spiritual power].
Nonetheless, the spiritual offices of the church are held in high regard.
[As a whole, one had sunk quite low, though there were still certainly
many “who had not sullied their clothes,” and who now most assuredly
“walk with Christ in white robes,” Revelation 3:4. It is from these that
we have received our fundamental teachings and our constitution.]
b) If the foregoing is highly instructive with regard to Wiebe’s own
and his closest sister congregation’s life, the following passage taken
from the same sou
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…