← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 79 (not an original page number)
Unit 79 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
this was an old evangelical-Anabaptist custom. This information
comes to us in the form of an article in the Mennonitische Rundschau
72
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
from the pen of the aged Elder Isaak Peters, formerly school teacher in
Fuerstenau and Sparrau, 51 Molotschna, South Russia, then elder of the
Pordenau Church, and now, since 1874, in Henderson, Nebraska, one of
our most knowledgeable, if not the most knowledgeable student of
Anabaptist literature. The article in the Mennonitische Rundschau vol.
37, 1906, for which we are deeply thankful to our aged honorable teacher,
since it, at the same time, sheds light on the preparation of our
ministers “in the bosom of the congregation,” contains the following:
a) “An abstract from Mennonite writings for the Mennonitische
Rundschau and Herold der Wahrheit. When, during the age of the
Reformation, the various religious movements had taken on distinct
forms and the Lutherans and other reformed groups had united in state
churches, these strove to have all their ministers acquire academic
degrees ... at the universities. The so-called Anabaptists, the later
Mennonites, however, who had maintained a living faith through mutual
edification . . . even in ancient times during the period of the martyrs
as a small flock, were unaware of such a necessity since they had for
hundreds of years [as Waldensians, etc.] flourished without such
institutions during periods of persecution, as a rose among thorns,
through the preaching of the Gospel by laymen. Since they were united
in congregations, which consisted solely of converted members, all of
whom studied the Bible themselves, . . . they were content with the
appointment of teachers and servants of the Word in line with the
evangelical and apostolic example [without a university education]. . . .
Instead of such institutions they fostered, aside from the sermons in the
church service, Bible studies and mutual edification in their circles ; for it
is apparent from their remaining writings that such meetings existed in
the 16th century during Menno Simons’ and his co-worker’s time and for
some time thereafter, where every individual member of the congregation
was given the opportunity to ask questions regarding difficult passages
of Scripture. Even during the periods of persecution they met secretly to
study God’s Word and strengthen one another in accordance with the
Apostolic teachings, I Thess. 5:11. . . . Here a passage of God’s Word
was read . . . and explained, the latter task performed by those more
advanced in the faith or the ministers of the Word, in accordance with I
Cor. 14:26-33, after which the church service was closed with prayer
according to Acts 20:36; 21:5.
b) “Merely preaching at the services in the Mennonite congrega-
tions began where the Bible and mutual edification hours were
discontinued, where laymen 52 ceased to study God’s Word themselves,
in accordance with John 5:39, and gave up
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…