Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 82 (not an original page number)

Unit 82 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
pled with the discipline exercised by the congregation, should produce a unique brand of gentleness in the individual Mennonite, that their strict religiosity, their simple affirmation of the truth and their original frugality [simplicity and moderation] kept them from violent outbursts of passion and made deception as well as extreme anger infrequent occurrences, is a natural consequence of these principles. But the [earlier hostile] treatment on the part of their neighbors and government officials must have had a decisive influence on the formation of certain characteristics, which certain people have believed to have observed in them. Thus some have asserted that Mennonites are sly, slow, uncommunicative and distrustful. In the earlier period the Mennonites were hated more by all religious groups, avoided more by them and thus forced to rely more upon themselves. The constant fear in which they lived forced them to be cautious and deliberate. They sought to lead an exemplary pious and faultless life and to confirm this with outward appearance, in order, they believed, to be best able to refute the calumnies of their opponents. d) It is probably because of this that a certain caution and fear, a certain withdrawal into oneself and a partial avoidance of alien religious groups arose in them, a unique characteristic some have discerned in their early history. [Only then?] e) Their customs are simple, while crimes 56 and illegitimate births 56 are infrequent occurrences amongst them ; still less frequent are suicides. 56 These assertions regarding the Mennonite congregations are confirmed by statistical evidence [ca. 1820]. Simplicity, order, nearly fearful cleanliness, abstention from sports and boisterous activity prevail [?!] in all friendly gatherings as well as within the circle of the individual f amil y f) As a steward of his property, the Mennonite deserves praise; industry and cleanliness prevail in his home and farm buildings, peace in his family. No one has made more progress in agriculture than the Prussian Mennonite [to 1820]. g) The Mennonites aid and support their brethren in the faith in every case of necessity without being called upon to do so, indeed without having any agency or direction to take charge of such matters. [It is especially for this purpose that the deacon is the elder’s assistant, and that the spiritual Mennonite congregation is an ancient apostolic association for mutual assistance: I Cor. 16:1 and other passages!] The poor among the Mennonites never suffer want; the Mennonite whose buildings have burned down, who has been robbed or who has met with 76 DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS an accident can count on having nearly everything restored to him. [Compare our Russian Mennonite insurance system, an outgrowth of these principles.] Other Protestants and Catholics also often benefit in this way at the hands of the Mennonites, although this seldom happens where

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…