← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 82 (not an original page number)
Unit 82 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
pled with
the discipline exercised by the congregation, should produce a unique
brand of gentleness in the individual Mennonite, that their strict
religiosity, their simple affirmation of the truth and their original
frugality [simplicity and moderation] kept them from violent outbursts
of passion and made deception as well as extreme anger infrequent
occurrences, is a natural consequence of these principles. But the [earlier
hostile] treatment on the part of their neighbors and government officials
must have had a decisive influence on the formation of certain
characteristics, which certain people have believed to have observed in
them. Thus some have asserted that Mennonites are sly, slow,
uncommunicative and distrustful. In the earlier period the Mennonites
were hated more by all religious groups, avoided more by them and thus
forced to rely more upon themselves. The constant fear in which they
lived forced them to be cautious and deliberate. They sought to lead an
exemplary pious and faultless life and to confirm this with outward
appearance, in order, they believed, to be best able to refute the
calumnies of their opponents.
d) It is probably because of this that a certain caution and fear, a
certain withdrawal into oneself and a partial avoidance of alien religious
groups arose in them, a unique characteristic some have discerned in
their early history. [Only then?]
e) Their customs are simple, while crimes 56 and illegitimate
births 56 are infrequent occurrences amongst them ; still less frequent are
suicides. 56 These assertions regarding the Mennonite congregations are
confirmed by statistical evidence [ca. 1820]. Simplicity, order, nearly
fearful cleanliness, abstention from sports and boisterous activity prevail
[?!] in all friendly gatherings as well as within the circle of the individual
f amil y
f) As a steward of his property, the Mennonite deserves praise;
industry and cleanliness prevail in his home and farm buildings, peace in
his family. No one has made more progress in agriculture than the
Prussian Mennonite [to 1820].
g) The Mennonites aid and support their brethren in the faith in
every case of necessity without being called upon to do so, indeed
without having any agency or direction to take charge of such matters.
[It is especially for this purpose that the deacon is the elder’s assistant,
and that the spiritual Mennonite congregation is an ancient apostolic
association for mutual assistance: I Cor. 16:1 and other passages!] The
poor among the Mennonites never suffer want; the Mennonite whose
buildings have burned down, who has been robbed or who has met with
76
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
an accident can count on having nearly everything restored to him.
[Compare our Russian Mennonite insurance system, an outgrowth of
these principles.] Other Protestants and Catholics also often benefit in
this way at the hands of the Mennonites, although this seldom happens
where
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…