← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 91 (not an original page number)
Unit 91 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ted only a select few who complain vigorously regarding
the decay among their people and hold to strict moral discipline. The
playing of cards, dancing, drinking are punished by expulsion from the
congregation. They have very few poor people in their midst. In order to
retain their landed property they permit no mixed marriages: whoever
marries anyone outside the Mennonite faith is expelled, otherwise their
property would fall into the hands of strangers, a predicament to be
avoided since they are not allowed to acquire any more land without
losing their right to exemption from military service. [Not the case
today, since all of the Mennonites there must serve in the military.] It is
for this reason that the surplus population emigrates, especially to
Russia. As the Lord Lieutenant of the province told me, the Mennonites
of the Elbing lowlands are so wealthy that they turn the scale in the
election of those chamber deputies [members of the Prussian House of
Representatives] elected by those who pay the highest taxes.” (Thus far
Wichera.)
6. The main court preacher Stark concluded his Geschichte der
Taufgesinnten (History of the Anabaptists) with: “They have finally had
the good fortune to work their way up to the position of a considerable
religious party which finds itself flourishing, a fate which they have
earned because of the patience with which they endured the sufferings
inflicted upon them throughout the centuries, but even more by the good
behavior through which they, in due course, distinguished themselves
amongst all Christians, and which everyone, who is concerned about the
happiness of his fellow Christian and religious freedom, cannot begrudge
them.” (In Reiswitz and Wadzeck.)
7. Conclusions
The above assessments of the Mennonites on the part of
non-Mennonites are certainly very favorable, indeed perhaps much too
favorable rather than too harsh for the majority of those living in the
17th, 18th and partially for those of the 19th century, a period which we
must characterize as the decline of the movement. May this serve to
console us when, in the following special section on the Mennonites in
Russia, we will have to look at so many well documented darker aspects
of our congregational life, darker aspects which, it has been demon-
strated, were continued in Russia although they had their origin in the
old homeland. In the face of all this impoverishment this much is clear,
however, that evangelical teachings and apostolic church organization
exercise an extraordinarily large influence upon the moral, cultural,
economic and social development of a society, an influence which stands
Customs and Character
85
in direct relation to the extent to which doctrine is pure and the concept
of the church is in harmony with the holy fountain of the Scriptures.
God’s promise: “I will do good unto those who love me to the
thousandth generation,” has also been powerfully and clearly proven.
Let
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…