← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 93 (not an original page number)
Unit 93 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
n governments, who had accom-
panied her on her famous "journey to Taurida,” the Empress herself
received them in a ceremonious, respectful and solemn manner, as did the
powerful Russian Prince Potemkin, who showed them his good-will.
Special respect and favor was extended the two Mennonite delegates
when the Empress requested that they accompany her on her tour of the
Crimean Peninsula. When, on their return journey, they came to St.
Petersburg, the two delegates were introduced to Russia’s heir-apparent,
Paul I (who later became emperor and signed the Great Charter of
Privileges, incorporating it into the law of the land), who accorded them
the privilege of kissing his hand and in turn graciously kissed them on
the cheek. This, together with the previously mentioned medal of honor
given by Tsar Alexander I to Elder Cornelius Warkentin, is an important
indication of the confidence, graciousness, and high expectations with
which the Russian monarchs called and received our forefathers. Such
acclaim could not last forever. We could not live with it, nor have we
deserved it!
§29 3. Already in the fall of 1788 a large contingent of Mennonites set
out for their new homeland.
§30 4.a) The very high expectations and demands relative to the overall
efficiency of the Mennonites with which they were invited to Russia is
demonstrated by the following excerpt of the “Plain Explanation etc. of
the Kleine Gemeinde etc.” 1845, Danzig, page 14: “Few people pay more
attention to the Word of the Lord and to the monarch’s will, which was
transmitted to us through the Director and Commissioner Trappe in a
royal communication that contains three admonitory points: First, that
the Mennonites, as much as possible, diligently seek to maintain good
teachers and pastors who will care for the salvation of their souls and
foster a pious life, so that we will in Russia also let our light so shine
before men that they will see our good works and glorify our Father in
heaven. Secondly, that we should guard against questionable members
among us, and not bring those with us that openly live in serious vices,
such as drunkenness, whereby the good name of the Mennonites in
Russia could be disgraced. . . b) How thoroughly and carefully von
Trappe proceeded can be seen from his visit to the Mennonites of
Holland in Amsterdam. He probably wanted to study the co mmuni ty at
its source and obtain the approval, co-operation and advice of the Dutch
Anabaptists, who were the Mennonites’ influential friends, advisors, and
protectors in all countries. Compare the interesting letter from
Amsterdam above, V, 5, Appendix 2.
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
Bartsch Monument in the Rosental Colony near Chortitza.
VIII.
SETTLING IN RUSSIA
1. In the year 1789 a group of 228 families formed the very first §31
settlement in the District of Chortitza at the junction of the Dnieper and
Chortitza rivers in the Province of Ekaterinoslav. 3 4 Another
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…