Soviet Evangelicals Since World War II, Walter Sawatsky, 1981

6, p. 65. 11. See appendix for list. 12. BV 4/57 provided photographs of each. 13: They were: Michael Zhidkov, A. N.:Kiriukhantsev, Ilia M. Orlov, and M. V. Melnik in England (1956-58); A. N. Stoian and G. V. Nebesnyi in England (1957-59). Michael Zhidkov studied in Canada (1961-62) and N. I. Juvanen in Sweden at the same time. Iuvanen and Nebesnyi appear not to have worked for the AUCECB subsequently. (BV 6/63, p. 20.) ; 14. In 1962, the 30,000 rubles spent on hosting foreign guests accounted for most of the deficit spending. (AS 770, p. 121.) 15, Annual income was: 275,000 rubles (1956); 280,000 (1957); 258,000 (1958); 224,000 (1959); 222,700 (1960); 197,200 (1961); 178,000 (1962); 93,000 (first 9 months of 1963). The 1962 expenses totaled 217,800 rubles, which was 39,800 more than the income for that year. (AS 770, pp. 125-27.) 16. Ibid. 17. A key leader, M. E. Ziubanov, who had split 22 congregations, made a speech followed by D. D. Shapovalov, who had persuaded Ziubanov of the error of his separatism. (BV 6/63, p. 39.) 18. Ibid., pp. 21-22. 19, Ibid., p. 36. It had no influence in Chernovitsy, Zakarpathia, Ternopol, Volhynia, Rovno, and other oblasts while in Kherson, Nikolaev, Dnepropetrovsk, Lvov, Rn and other oblasts there were only two or three groups. 20. Ibid. 2]. His name was Heinrich K. Allert. See below, chapter 10, p. 281. 22. AS 770, pp. 180, 182. : 93, Ibid., p. 130. Based on financial indicators given by Ivanov, presidium members received 5,000 rubles annually. This was indeed higher than the average Soviet salary of 120rubles per month but clergymen had topay anincome tax of 40%: 94. P. K. Egle, born 1908, was presbyter of one of the strongest central Latvian churches (Talsen) in the forties and fifties. In 1963 he was a in Iaunelgav. He served as senior presbyter or bishop of Latvia from 1966-1977, when he became bishop emeritus. 95. BV 6/63, p. 47. 26. Religious Ferment, Appendix I, pp. 190-210. My approach here is. to assume the influence of Kriuchkov and Prokofiev as demonstrated by Bourdeaux and to focus instead on the significance of the changes for a free church polity. 27. This is a corrective to Hans Hebly’s assertion (Protestants in Russia, pp. 121-24) that the union was a federal union from the beginning. 98, Council members were: Jacob 1. Zhidkov, N,. A. Levindanto, A. L. Andreev, A. V. Karev, [L. G. Ivanov, K, S, Veliseichik, D. 1. Ponomarchuk, I. Ja. Tatarchenko, 1. I. Motorin, and A. N. Karpov. 99.. They were: E. N. Raevskii, A. M. Sil’dos, S. P. adiukhin, M. S. Vashchuk, G. G. Ponurko. 30. A. L. Mitsevich, Chmn.; N. N. Mel nikov; F. RB. Astakhov. 31. BV 3/64, p. 65. The Union Defended, 1963-1969 295 32. BV 4/64, p. 76. A. A. Nosarev repl ini | 4, ALA. placed M. I. Sorok pine [serene ne site Became senior presbyter a the Ned War av rc o (Pentecostal) replaced A. G. Kvash i ; iimenko was appointed to Sumy and F. B. Kislits to a