← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 102 (not an original page number)
Unit 102 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
t; by 1812 he had become the elder. Scores of
people from other faiths thronged to hear hiin speak. His preaching tours
in West Prussia were well-received and very successful. It was he who, at
a time of extreme need and despair, during which a large part of the
congregation was about to be scattered in all directions, successfully
negotiated with Tsar Nicholas I for permission to migrate to Russia.
This permission was granted in the form of a large letter sealed with the
imperial seal, which Lange was able to lay before his distressed
congregation, thus saving it from ultimate dissolution. In 1835 he
arrived in Russia with the first group of immigrants. Here too he served,
a patriarchal, priestly gray -haired man with a flowing white “Menno-
beard,” 22 to the benefit of all in his own and its sister congregations,
loved and acknowledged by all until 1841. Later his nephew, the minister
Wilhelm Lange, became a similarly gifted and beloved personality.
11. Because of these men, Gnadenfeld became the center for a
religious movement of greater warmth, the magnetic center for those
who called themselves “brethren” long before the M.B. Church was
organized. Many members of other Mennonite congregations formally
joined Gnadenfeld because they sympathized with its position; but even
more came as guests to the Sunday and festive services, especially to the
Bible studies and mission festivals. 23 Here too private study groups
sprang up, as did mission sewing circles, although the first experienced
considerable opposition from the very beginning. Gnadenfeld gave birth
to the M.B. Church of 1860, and we impart more details about this
congregation first because none of our other immigrant congregations
possesses such a wealth of evidence regarding its former way of life, its
trials and tribulations, and, secondly, because the history of the M.B.
Church cannot be separated from the history of the Gnadenfeld
congregation. Our story is based on the archival material mentioned
100
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
earlier, the oral and written communications of the founders of the
M.B. Church— Heinrich Huebert (Liebenau-Kuban), Jakob Reimer
(Gnadenfeld-Wiesenfeld), Johann Claassen (Liebenau-Kuban), among
others— and from the things I have seen and heard. The “pious” or
“Bible students” of the 1850s spoke of Gnadenfeld in the spirit of the
song: “To Mount Zion I am Bound”; the opponents of this movement
nicknamed those from Gnadenfeld the “Lutheran Mennonites,” “Mora-
vians,” “enthusiasts,” and with great contempt, “the pious ones!”
12. It was one of the peculiarities of this congregation that it had its
own confession of faith, 24 probably in common with that of the
Alexanderwohl congregation. The archives contain two such confessions:
the first, according to the title-page, consisting of forty short articles was
“translated from the Dutch into High German by Elder Peter Jantz
of Franz tal (Prussia) and copied in 1812 by El
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…