← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 103 (not an original page number)
Unit 103 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
der Wilhelm Lange of
Brenkenhofswalde”; the second consists of thirty articles and “was
drawn from the Bible in 1787 by the honorable elder and minister Jakob
Wedell of Przechovka near Schwetz [cf. above V, 5 "Elder Wiebe”] and
copied by Wilhelm Lange (the same as the above) in 1815.” One is
amazed at the theological education and the classic doctrinal insights
which these simple farmer-bishops, contemporaries of such men as
Cornelius Warkentin and Gerhard Wiebe, all trained within the bosom of
the church, developed. The following tendencies should be noted in these
confessions (the last of which, as we were informed, was used until
recently in a somewhat abbreviated form in Gnadenfeld, when a joint
confession of the Flemish and Frisian Mennonites in Russia was issued):
the weighty doctrine of election through grace and free will which, in the
old Flemish confession, had been framed from a somewhat one-sided
Arminian point of view (with the stress upon free will), and which the
Frisian confessions passed over in silence, received a cautious, middle-of-
the-road treatment. Footwashing was taught as being a worshipful
church function and was practiced after (later before) the communion
service. The confession also speaks of “correct evangelical fasting in
accordance with the Scriptures,” and a conscious laying hold of the
forgiveness of sins in Christ through a profound faith, as well as the
explicitly stressed necessity for vigilance in regard to the doctrine of the
firm security of the true believer.
13. The proven cordial relations between the Brenkenhofswalde-
Franztal congregations and the Moravian Brethren are also of consider-
able interest. Indeed, from 1812 until the emigration of 1835, the
congregation stood, to a certain extent, under the protection and
supervision of these Moravian Brethren! This came about in the
following manner. Around 1812 various political organizations with
Unrest and Reform
101
religious names and forms appeared in Prussia. As a consequence, all
private assemblies of a religious nature were prohibited with the
exception of those of the Moravian Brethren, who had the confidence of
Frederick William III, and those under their control. The police became
suspicious of the private Bible studies of the Neumark Mennonite
congregation (Brenkenhofswalde-Franztal) and refused to concede that
the Mennonites possessed a unique church organization, or indeed that
this organization was based on specific ecclesiastical rights. Whether due
to a deficient knowledge of political affairs, moral weakness in the face of
police chicanery, or the fact that Elder W. Lange favored the Moravian
Brethren— the Neumark Mennonite congregation (now "Gnadenfeld”)
placed itself under the care and protection— and supervision of the
Moravian Church with regard to its private gatherings. It nonetheless
remained Mennonite and derived a great blessing from this relationship.
This account is taken f
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…