Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 103 (not an original page number)

Unit 103 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
der Wilhelm Lange of Brenkenhofswalde”; the second consists of thirty articles and “was drawn from the Bible in 1787 by the honorable elder and minister Jakob Wedell of Przechovka near Schwetz [cf. above V, 5 "Elder Wiebe”] and copied by Wilhelm Lange (the same as the above) in 1815.” One is amazed at the theological education and the classic doctrinal insights which these simple farmer-bishops, contemporaries of such men as Cornelius Warkentin and Gerhard Wiebe, all trained within the bosom of the church, developed. The following tendencies should be noted in these confessions (the last of which, as we were informed, was used until recently in a somewhat abbreviated form in Gnadenfeld, when a joint confession of the Flemish and Frisian Mennonites in Russia was issued): the weighty doctrine of election through grace and free will which, in the old Flemish confession, had been framed from a somewhat one-sided Arminian point of view (with the stress upon free will), and which the Frisian confessions passed over in silence, received a cautious, middle-of- the-road treatment. Footwashing was taught as being a worshipful church function and was practiced after (later before) the communion service. The confession also speaks of “correct evangelical fasting in accordance with the Scriptures,” and a conscious laying hold of the forgiveness of sins in Christ through a profound faith, as well as the explicitly stressed necessity for vigilance in regard to the doctrine of the firm security of the true believer. 13. The proven cordial relations between the Brenkenhofswalde- Franztal congregations and the Moravian Brethren are also of consider- able interest. Indeed, from 1812 until the emigration of 1835, the congregation stood, to a certain extent, under the protection and supervision of these Moravian Brethren! This came about in the following manner. Around 1812 various political organizations with Unrest and Reform 101 religious names and forms appeared in Prussia. As a consequence, all private assemblies of a religious nature were prohibited with the exception of those of the Moravian Brethren, who had the confidence of Frederick William III, and those under their control. The police became suspicious of the private Bible studies of the Neumark Mennonite congregation (Brenkenhofswalde-Franztal) and refused to concede that the Mennonites possessed a unique church organization, or indeed that this organization was based on specific ecclesiastical rights. Whether due to a deficient knowledge of political affairs, moral weakness in the face of police chicanery, or the fact that Elder W. Lange favored the Moravian Brethren— the Neumark Mennonite congregation (now "Gnadenfeld”) placed itself under the care and protection— and supervision of the Moravian Church with regard to its private gatherings. It nonetheless remained Mennonite and derived a great blessing from this relationship. This account is taken f

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…