← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 107 (not an original page number)
Unit 107 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
'20s and
’30s: since 1835-40 Gnadenfeld was more attractive. For a long time
Pastor Wuest of Neu-Hoffnung had intimate fellowship with the
ministers of Gnadenfeld 29 (Wuests’s influence and importance will be
discussed more specifically in Chapter XII.) At this time we want merely
to enumerate some of the more important “Wuest-brethren” in the
Gnadenfeld congregation, and those who, although members of other
congregations, had close ties to Gnadenfeld: Johann Claassen, Liebenau;
his wife’s brother Jakob Reimer of Felsental, Gnadenfeld; Wilhelm
Bartel, long resident in Berdiansk; Abram Comelsen, a teacher in
Elizabethtal and member of the Rudnerweide congregation; Jakob
Becker, Rudnerweide and member of that congregation; Heinrich
Huebert, Liebenau, member of the Ohrloff congregation; and Abraham
Peters, Ladekopp, member of the Petershagen congregation. These were
the most important co-founders of the M.B. Church in 1860. Elder
August Lenzmann, Gnadenfeld; Andreas Flaming, Schardau, minister of
the Gnadenfeld Church; Heinrich Schmidt, Pastva, minister of the
Gnadenfeld Church; Benjamin Jantz and Abraham Braun, Grossweide
(in later years a “Felsentaler Friend”); Peter Siemens, Conteniusfeld, a
prominent leader of the Bible study movement and later a well-known
teacher who joined the Ohrloff and then the M.B. Church; Abram
Matthies, Rudnerweide; Leonhard Sudermann, Berdiansk, a minister
and then elder of the Berdiansk congregation first affiliated with
Gnadenfeld, which later became independent, who died as an elder in
America; Jakob Buhler, minister in Berdiansk, who died young, having
served as Wuest’s “Jonathan”; Hermann Sudermann, Berdiansk,
student in the “Rauhes Haus” near Hamburg; Wilhelm and Benjamin
Lange, former ministers of the Gnadenfeld congregation (cf. above # 16 ) :
Nicholas Schmidt, Gnadenfeld, minister at Steinbach; Johann Schmidt
Gnadenfeld; Johannes Lange, Gnadenfeld; Hausknecht, a teacher in
Gnadenfeld and probably a Swiss Mennonite; Abram Wiebe and Dietrich
Dick, Rudnerweide; Peter Dick and his son Abram, Pordenau, were all
Unrest and Reform
105
original co-founders of the “Church of the Temple” or "Friends of
Jerusalem” (adherents of Christoph Hoffmann from Kirchenhardthof in
Wuerttemberg), but not all of them stayed with the movement. Thus
Minister Abram Dick— as many others who had originally joined the
“temple” movement— later joined and then became minister of the
Ohrloff congregation. Aside from Heinrich Huebert there were other
outstanding believers in the Ohrloff congregation before and after 1860,
though not as explicitly “brothers of Wuest” but more in line with
Tobias Voth and his associates, such as: Peter Fast, teacher at
Taschtschenak for 25 years, and his brother Daniel, teacher in
Tiegenhagen and Blumenort, both ministers and elders later in the M.B.
Church; Bernhard Harder, teacher in Halbstadt, B lumens tein and other
places, since 1861 minister of the Halbs
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…