← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 108 (not an original page number)
Unit 108 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
tadt-Ohrloff congregation, to date
the most influential Mennonite minister and most prominent Mennonite
poet in Russia, who died as an itinerant minister in Neu-Halbstadt in
1883; Kroeker, teacher in Muensterberg, who died as a minister in
Sagradovka; Johann Fast, teacher in Schoenau, and later in the Crimea,
who died in America as a member of the “Krimmer M.B. Church” if we
are not mistaken; Joh ann Harder, minister in Blumenstein, later elder of
the Ohrloff congregation; Jakob Martens of Tiegenhagen, minister and
assistant elder of the Halbstadt-Ohrloff congregation and not a few
others.
18. a) The brethren Johann Claassen of Liebenau, Jakob Reimer of
Gnadenfeld, Heinrich Huebert of Liebenau, Abram Wiebe and Abram
Matthies of Rudnerweide, Nicholas Schmidt of Steinbach, Elder August
Lenzmann of Gnadenfeld, Johann Schmidt of Gnadenfeld, Peter and
Abram Dick of Pordenau, along with many others, founded the so-called
“Brethren School” in Gnadenfeld. For the conditions of the time, it
received remarkable financial and other support: contributions ranged
from 25 to 1,000 rubles in silver (a bank-note of 3,500 from Abram Wiebe
of Rudnerweide). To support this venture, the group invested in a brick
factory and a lumber yard, which brought substantial returns. Even the
Wuerttemberg brethren in Neu-Hoffnung participated with a donation of
400 rubles, and their brethren in Kharkov and Moscow took an interest
in the school: A Moscow brother, Maibom, the owner of a factory,
donated a piano, and believers from St. Petersburg and Reval hoped that
the school would produce workers for home missions s imil ar to what the
"Rauhes Haus” was doing for the Protestant churches.
b) Johann Claassen of Liebenau stood in the forefront of this venture,
giving freely of his time, money, inspiration and strength. Better
education, a strongly Christian training based on the principles of
Pietism, especially for their own children, the practicing of philanthropy
for the common good (that is why the school was sometimes called a
106
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
“school for orphans,” since talented orphans and the children of
impoverished parents were to be given preference in it), or “home
missions” were to be the goals of the school as far as Claassen and his
associates were concerned. They patterned the school after the Moravian
institutions and Wichem’s rescue missions, specifically the “Rauhes
Haus” of Hamburg. This Gnadenfeld school, along with the Ohrloff
Association School, was accredited in 1859 (?) by the Supervisory
Commission in Odessa as a teacher-training institute.
c) Twice Claassen travelled to St. Petersburg and Reval on matters
relating to the school, stopping en route in Kharkov and Moscow to
establish intimate relations with the “brethren” in these areas, gaining
access to their very highest circles, especially in St. Petersburg and
Reval. Pastor Landesen and the merchant Heymann were two especially
close friend
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…