← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 109 (not an original page number)
Unit 109 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
s in Kharkov. On his first journey, in 1854, he was
accompanied by four young brethren: Wilhelm Bartel, a Bible colporteur
and evangelist under the auspices of the pietistic Mennonites and the
Wuerttemberg brethren, Hermann Sudermann of Berdiansk, Jakob
Knauer, one of the Wuerttemberg men, and Wilhelm Heine of Prischib.
d) Knauer and Heine remained in Reval for several months in the
"Rescue Home” of “Papa Bauer” (the housefather and Wichem’s former
student), whereupon they proceeded to the Mission House in Barmen,
becoming missionaries themselves. Heine went to Sumatra (later he was
pastor for many years in Neu-Stuttgart near Berdiansk). The departure
of these two young men from Russia— as difficult as that was in those
days— was made possible through the mediation of the Duke of
Oldenburg (a relative of the ruling tsarist family) in St. Petersburg, who
had become interested in the matter through Claassen's friends amongst
the pastors and aristocratic families in Reval and St. Petersburg.
Hermann Sudermann remained in Reval for three years at “Papa
Bauer’s" institute (which was heavilv supported by the love-offerings of
the Mennonite and Wuerttemberg brethren) as an intern and student.
He was to become the director of the Brotherhood School. In 1857
Claassen made a second trip to Reval and St. Petersburg, this time
accompanied by Johann Schmidt of Gnadenfeld. Some time later,
Hermann Sudermann, accompanied by Nicholas Schmidt of Steinbach,
went to Wichem’s “Rauhes Haus” where he studied and did some
practical work for a time. Nicholas Schmidt also visited the well-known
orthodox Lutheran revivalist and father of missions, Pastor Harms, in
Hermannsburg and his institution, Christian Hoffmann of Kirchenhardt-
hof, and others which probably included Moravian institutions. As a
result, Johann Lange of Gnadenfeld was sent to Kirchenhardthof.
e) Meanwhile the “Brotherhood School” was opened in 1857, with
Hausknecht as temporary teacher and set up in temporary quarters.
Unrest and Reform
107
Before long, however, Heinrich Franz, Sr., the famous teacher, was
appointed to the school against the wishes of Claassen and Reimer, who
did not believe his Christianity to be motivated by a “living faith."
Nicholas and Johan Schmidt, on the other hand, as well as Lenzmann,
preferred Franz. No doubt, Franz was a much more gifted teacher than
Hausknecht, as Claassen, Reimer and even Hausknecht himself recog-
nized— yet for Claassen and Reimer religious ideals were the most
important. Already in 1858 the "brethren” began to divide into the more
extreme “enthusiasts” (froehlichen ) , who, no longer satisfied with
Wuest, over-emphasized “free grace” and the resulting joy, and the more
"rational” and “church-minded,” in whose direction, in contrast to his
earlier period when Claassen and Reimer had been his intimates, Wuest
more and more inclined (cf. XIII. “Pastor Wuest”). Thus a serious
conflict erupted between Cla
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…