← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 121 (not an original page number)
Unit 121 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
members were not removed from the congregation until they
became contrite but were merely subjected to a temporary ecclesiastical
punishment. And yet the “good seed”, of which Hildebrand speaks,
remained strong and plentiful: so much salt and light was present that
the old ideals were never quite vanquished. Sufficient strength was
available to avert both an economic and a final moral and spiritual ruin
(for proof cf. H 57) and to effect salvage and reform efforts later in every
respect with varying degrees of success. Periods of emigration and
settlement are always extremely trying, revealing everything that is evil
and rotten and forcing the good and the healthy to fight to its very
existence. Even the later groups of our people, who emigrated and
settled under much more favorable conditions— the M.B. groups
included— have amply demonstrated the truth of the above. That is the
way it was already during the exodus from Egypt and the settlement in
Canaan! Read the book of Judges!
k) “Through the withdrawal of the delegates from public life,” writes
D. H. Epp in another place, “the mutual attacks by the opposing parties
were ameliorated. ... It is true that thick fog banks once again swept
over the Chortitza Colony in the ’40s when the ‘Agricultural Society’
took up the quarrel with the colony administration and the ministers of
the church, which enjoyed the support of the vast majority of the church
Documentary Supplement
119
members. However, this quarrel no longer produced any permanent
divisions in the church.” (Compare VI: “Lichtenau” and “Heinrich
Wiens.”]
3. The Imperial Charter or Charter of Privileges
(Supplement to #32)
In spite of all the disheartening experiences of the early years the
settlers never lost sight of the future or the welfare of their descendants
with regard to spiritual and civil matters. A new petition, to be given the
promised imperial privileges, was submitted to the government. Elder
David Epp and Minister Gerhard Willms were dispatched to St.
Petersburg on June 29, 1798, to procure this document. After more than
two years of anxious waiting in the capital city, they finally returned on
October 28, 1800. A parchment with gold print, this document, whose
unessential articles we have condensed while giving the important ones
in full, reads as follows:
“We, through God’s enabling grace,
Paul the First
Emperor and Autocrat of all Russians, etc.
etc., etc.,
“In order to authenticate our most gracious grant in response to the
petition received by us from the Mennonites settled in the New Russian
provinces, who, according to the testimony of their supervisors 42 and
because of their outstanding industry and their commendable way of life,
can serve as an example to the others settled there, and who, because of
this, have become deserving of our special attention, we have, in this
charter of privileges granted to them, not only affirmed all of the rights
and priv
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…