← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 122 (not an original page number)
Unit 122 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ileges previously agreed to, but have also, in order to encourage
their thrift and concern for agriculture still more, graciously granted
them additional rights in the following articles.
“First: we reaffirm to them and their descendants the religious
freedoms 43 promised earlier, by virtue of which they are entitled to
follow their faith and church practices unhindered. We also graciously
grant, that if occasion should require them to testify in a court of law,
their spoken ‘yes’ or ‘no’ shall be considered legal in lieu of an oath.
“Second: [Concerns the allotment of 64 dessiatines of land to each
family]. . . .
“Third: [Concerns the freedom to establish businesses]. . . .
“Fourth: [Gives them the specific right to brew beer, vinegar and
brandy]. . . .
“Fifth: [No stranger may build a tavern or otherwise sell brandy on
120
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
the property of the Mennonites without their permission]. . . .
“Sixth: We affirm our most gracious guarantee that none of the
Mennonites already settled or who may choose to settle in our domain in
the future, nor their children and their descendants, shall at any time be
forced to serve in the military 44 or civil service, unless they specifically
volunteer for them.
“Seventh: [Exemption from the extended quartering of military
troops, transportation or service to the crown such as the obligation to
maintain roads and bridges in good repair]. . . .
“Eighth: [Concerns the rights of property and ownership, grants
them their own inheritance practices and care of orphans]. . . .
“Ninth: [Grants them ten to fifteen years’ exemption from imperial
taxation]. . . .
"Tenth: [An order to all authorities in no way to reduce these
privileges but to protect them in all instances]. . . .
“Given in the city of Gatschino, the 6th of September in the year
1800 A.D., the fourth of our reign and the second as Grand Master.
Paul,
Count of Rostoptschin.”
(An unabridged version of the Charter of Privileges appears in D. Epp’s
Die Chortitza Mennoniten .)
IV. Evaluation of the Mennonite Colonies by the Privy Councillor,
i.e. Senator Contenius, and Privy Councillor A. Klaus
(Supplement to #32-34 )
1. a) To our consolation, a much more favorable evaluation of our
earliest immigrant forefathers, than that from those personally and
immediately involved, came from outsiders, in particular from Privy
Councillor A. Klaus’ pamphlet entitled Unsere Kolonien (Our Colonies),
written at the request of the government toward the end of the ’60s.
b) On page 180 of the German translation by Jakob Toews we read
the following regarding the Chortitza settlers: “In spite of the enormous
advantages granted the Mennonites, and their reputation as model
farmers, the colonization they had undertaken never went well. Various
reasons were responsible for this, all [!?] of them, however, beyond the
control of the settlers themselves. According to the testimony of the
Privy Council
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…