← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 124 (not an original page number)
Unit 124 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
move to us [as was the case earlier in Chortitza], but
now a good nlimber of wealthy farmers, indeed some capitalists, were
among them. Due to these circumstances Molotschna came to be the
Mennonite economic and intellectual focal point, the pride and darling of
the [imperial] colonial authorities. . . .”
122
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
3. Regarding the Chortitza and Molotschna settlements in general,
Klaus writes the following:
a) “Until 1824 this colonization advanced mainly due to the influx
of new members from outside. During the same period the number of
villages in the Molotschna area increased to 40 while Chortitza grew to
18. . . . From then on Mennonite colonization was carried on with the
indigenous resources drawn from the mother colonies. . . .” [From 1824
onward the immigration of aliens was prohibited in principle and allowed
only in exceptional circumstances. See above, Gnadenfeld. By 1860 there
were 18 villages in the Chortitza area and 55 in the Molotschna area,
including the Hutterite 47 colony and 5 villages in the Bergthal region
located in the District of Mariupol. The population stood at about 30,000,
consisting of about 6,000 families. They owned about 165,000 dessiatines
crown lands and 100,000 dessiatines of privately acquired land on which
a large number of ranches, industrial plants and estates existed. One
dessiatine equals 2 Morgen 48 or 1 1/11 French hectars or 2 7/10 American
acres.]
b) “The Mennonite villages,” Klaus continues, “are generally not
very large; they usually consisted of 13 to 50 farms of approximately 65
dessiatines each. ... It might be superfluous to add that each village
was extremely spacious and arranged in an orderly fashion, that each
yard, the location of the house and farm buildings, their outside facades
and inner arrangement, were all identical, differing only in size and
roominess or solidity and quality of materials used. [Wood in the older,
while in the later period adobe or burned bricks— the latter used as a
pantile— were the most common materials.] Groves of trees and orchards
surround each village, and on either side of the streets there are shady
gardens and flower-beds. . . .
c) "Gradually the young people who left the farms turned to
professions, trades and businesses, etc. They founded new villages on
land set aside for such purposes and began farming on their own or
rented land, by preference on that of the Nogai. The Mennonites very
quickly [notwithstanding the fear expressed by Contenius] rose to a level
of prosperity and organization hitherto unknown among us. As though
by magic one village after another arose on the steppes where earlier
neither water nor shrub, not to speak of trees, had been common; plenty
of wholesome well-water could be found while groves of fruit, shade and
mulberry trees soon grew in abundance; lush, well-cared-for meadows,
large herds of sheep, cattle and horses, all of the best breeds, were
plentiful. [
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…