← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 132 (not an original page number)
Unit 132 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
er to us in accordance with our Flemish custom. We petitioned him
for an elder, but he was not yet inclined since he wanted to return again
later. When he returned he cast the lot between me and Cornelius
Janzen; and though I was inexperienced and unqualified, the lot fell to
me. Nevertheless, I sought to be content with my lot for I could see it
only as the will of God. Although we repeatedly requested ordination,
130
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
Janzen refused to comply because of the great opposition to such a
move, as we learned later. That was in 1815. We waited until 1816 for
ordination, in the meantime, we studied the Bible and many other
writings. Thus we discovered that Menno Simons had probably never
received ordination. [That is an error. According to many reliable
historical sources, Menno Simons was ordained by Obbe Philips, the
brother of Dirk Philips and a former Catholic priest, who was an
Anabaptist elder or bishop. But Menno appealed to it as little as he
appealed to his Catholic ordination as presbyter or priest, preferring to
appeal rather to his calling by the ‘godly.’ Compare above #4, e,
footnote.] Even Heinrich Janzen of Schoenwiese was ordained, as is
reported, by a minister, Cornelius Warkentin. [Wrong! C. War ken tin was
ordained by Elder Regier before his death. See above.] So I too accepted
it, and Cornelius Janzen ordained me as the elder of our small
congregation [‘about 18 or 20 brethren’] with an ordination sermon
before the congregation. Thereupon I, though very unworthy, served our
small congregation with baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Jakob Enns
and Johann Wiebe, however, held a meeting with their ministers where it
was decided that if those, whom I had baptized, wanted to join them,
they would have to be baptized again.
f) “In 1819, Elder Franz Goerz [the first Rudnerweider] came from
Prussia, and when he had arrived we visited him, seeking whether he
possessed the true faith. But we had no sooner begun our discussion with
him when we arrived at the millennium, when people would beat their
spears into pruning hooks and their swords into plowshares ... as he
read in Isaiah chapter 2. When I saw his error, my spirit became zealous
to convert Goerz, and I said: Do you know the book called Wandelnde
Seele (Wandering Soul)? [an old Anabaptist book]. ... He answered:
Yes. Then I said: Then you will know what it says of those
words. Two more times he spoke to us in an effort to draw us into this
terrible error. Later Peter Wedel [Alexanderwohl] came [from Prussia]
with his ministers. . . . He moved in with me. . . . All of them tried to
persuade me to come to their services ; they would even order the service
the way I wanted it. But I spoke to them on a number of issues, and
finally it came to the point where they asked me whether or not I
rejected all other nations [he means confessions]? Because they pressed
me hard for an answer, I told them that I believed that all thos
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…