← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 133 (not an original page number)
Unit 133 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e who
justified infant baptism, the swearing of oaths, and war could not be true
Christians no matter how holy they may otherwise appear. At this the
elder jumped from his chair and said: Man, you are making a terrible
statement which cannot stand! No appeal to the Scriptures helped me,
and I regretted having made so strong a statement until I had the
occasion to read tin even stronger one to him out of the writings of Peter
Peters [an old Anabaptist author], a statement far more terrible than my
own . . . and then I was satisfied! O God, how terrible it is now that
Documentary Supplement
131
Satan, in the guise of an angel of light, is free to deceive! Yet he deceives
only those who will not listen to the Word of God. The two elders Goerz
and Wedel taught diligently in our churches, indeed spoke much of love
and peace while opposing the severity exercised by the authorities ... for
everything pointed to the imminent inauguration of the millennium. [He
elaborates on the quarrels between those of Ohrloff and Lichtenau,
which destroyed all hopes for peace. Elder Wedel becomes president of
the Bible Society 54 which Reimer regards as terrible. New threats of
removal to Siberia and the like are now made against the Kleine
Gemeinde by the civil authorities, the colony administration, and higher
officials such as General Insow, whereby it would appear that the elders
Wedel, Goerz, and B. Fast, provoked by Klaas Reimer’s stubbomess, did
not act completely honorably.] But I was neither afraid nor would I give
in, for what God has established no man can destroy. God has dealt with
us Mennonites in accordance with Zechariah 13. . . .
g) “When I wanted to leave Prussia [which was very difficult for
him ] . . . because Danzig had become a desolate Babel, . . . and also
because my father-in-law, Elder Peter Epp, had often said on his
sick-bed: Children, you must go to Russia, for the Mennonites here are
done for, — I too thought to myself that God might perhaps raise up his
small flock in Russia. But alas, when I arrived here I found that terribly
hot-tempered elder and everything in a state of confusion. Thus, even
here, after many years, I had to leave the church, which for me was very
difficult. God, however, directed everything toward this end. And so
there we were, about eighteen or twenty brethren. . . . Then God began
to purify us because our number had increased, and with the increase the
false spirit, like an angel of light, had entered our midst and become our
upright brother, so that he might, as Menno Simons says, seat himself
among the saints, receive communion with them, wash their feet and be
an earnest and very helpful, virtuous spirit. . . . But when we refused to
be attracted to the world, he appeared amongst us in the guise of a
Pharisaical holiness, which was more frightening than his earlier form.
Had God not worked in our midst with great power, we should have
fallen to a worse state th
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…