← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 141 (not an original page number)
Unit 141 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ges in matters of state, freedom of conscience, or
detrimental effects upon rights and privileges, but which will influence
the spread of the saving Gospel and by means of which we partially
fulfill the command of Christ when he says: Go and preach the Gospel
to every creature. When we consider the results that have been achieved
by the Bible Society, we are forced to confess that the Lord has done
great things. Many Christians and heathen, etc., have come, through it
and under the direction of God, to a knowledge of the truth. That would
not have happened had it been a society that had either been created from
or drawn upon impure sources. Our Savior says: by their fruit you shall
know them. And if we recognize that this Bible Society, as well as the
others, was created out of pure motives, that they have their benevolent
function, and that nothing would be improved by its dissolution— then
why should we dissolve it? Those who love peace will readily unite
themselves with us, and we with them, regardless of this. Whoever
wishes, need not join the Bible Society: he wifi remain our dear friend
and brother nevertheless, as long as he lives as much as possible
Documentary Supplement
139
according to God’s Word, even though it be in weakness as in our case.
Should we dissolve the Bible Society in line with your well-meaning
advice, we would offend those who desire it. And if one considers the
consequences which would result from a dissolution, even that appears to
us to be filled with danger, namely: through printed reports all existing
Bible Societies know that a Bible Society has been organized here. And
what would they say were we to close ours; would it not offend many
members and hinder a good cause? Furthermore, Count Galizyn supports
the Bible Society with great zeal. What would he say? Would he remain
silent? We think not! [An illegible correction in the manuscript: ‘The
Lord C . . Could it not come to an investigation? And how would
these Mennonite colonies stand that? These reasons would be no more
acceptable than those which the financial advisor and Lord Contenius
rejected from the four above-named ministers with the words: ‘You just
do not want to. You are proud!’ Because these Bible Societies are viewed
by our respected and most gracious Tsar Alexander [the first], as well as
by the entire main Russian Bible Society, as so important we dare not
set our hand to their dissolution: we believe— and not we alone— that we
would put our colony in extreme danger and not improve our internal
situation with such an action. [That was introducing politics into church
affairs!] Had you, dear elders and ministers, said in your present letter
what you said about the Bible Societies in your previous one, we believe
it would have produced noble results. Many occasions, too numerous to
relate here, have led us to believe this. And since you, dear elders and
colleagues, were with our Bible Society earlier
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…