← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 142 (not an original page number)
Unit 142 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
and defended it, as is
clearly evident from your letter of August 29, of last year, but now
advise us to change our Bible Society into a correspondence society, that
is, are now against the Bible Society, your two positions cancel each
other out. We have now informed you in greater detail about the
situation which should aid you in arriving at a better conclusion. It is
our hope and the hope of many brethren that you, upon closer
examination, will make recommendations to the four ministers and their
adherents here in accordance with your earlier views, indeed it is our
brotherly request that you do so. It is known to you, as we mentioned in
our last letter, that the Chortitza ‘Ohms’ (elders) have been here but
accomplished nothing; we would invite them back if anything could be
accomplished by it. Nevertheless, we hope that your and the dear elders’
further loving counsel will always result in a few souls being won.
e) “Finally, in regard to the school in Ohrloff, whereof the four
ministers and numerous brethren, who wish to have their children
instructed by Mennonite teachers and to exclude those of other
confessions from the colony, have written you, we are forced to respond
that no one is forced to send his children to this school, for everyone may
decide for himself who is to instruct his child. Those who have concerns
140
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
in this regard should therefore calm themselves. Nevertheless, we are
surprised that you harbor so many fears; for we will not dismiss our
present teacher [Tobias Voth], who is of the Mennonite faith, and
appoint a Lutheran, even though most [the word “most” is crossed out
and "many” written over it] of the teachers in our colony are Lutheran
[i.e. in the village schools]. And the fact that people of other faiths may
not settle among us, can have nothing to do with the school, as any
unprejudiced and objective person will recognize on his own. What is
more, the ministers have never examined the school and cannot say with
any certainty whether or not it imparts instruction contrary to our
Mennonite principles. However, thanks be to God that the prejudices are
constantly decreasing. Many opponents, who have gone to investigate
the school, have invariably returned with a changed opinion, confessing
that their earlier judgment had been quite wrong. Of this there is ample
evidence. We have ourselves been to the school a number of times and
know of a certainty that its main concern is to win the children for
Jesus. Nor can the positive results achieved with the children be denied.
Should one observe the children in the absence of the teacher, one will find
them to be quiet, calm and introspective. When the children are
dismissed from school, most of them are serious and act in such a
manner as to give evidence of improvement. Everyone who has a taste
for Christianity notes this with considerable joy. The teacher also
conducts an evening session with the child
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…