← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 156 (not an original page number)
Unit 156 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
so high that sincere and brotherly
hands cannot be extended over them. . . . Christ says: ‘By this all men
will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.’
But if these differences stir up anger . . . then the words of Paul apply . . .
when he says: ‘. . . I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God,
but it is not enlightened . . .’, Rom. 10:2. Many a person believes he is a
Mennonite if he adheres as strictly as possible to his part of the article
on non-resistance, but at the same time forgets that he resists divine and
human regulations in many other regards. . . . His heart harbors bitter
revenge ... I have met men whose faces turned red when the problems of
other congregations were discussed. If we wish to become disciples of
Christ, then His word: ‘love your enemies,’ must take root in our hearts.
Adhering to the outward forms . . . does not make us true members of
Documentary Supplement
155
our congregation. The fruits of the spirit . . . are: ‘Love, joy . . Gal.
5:22. Obviously, however, the fruit of the flesh is, . . . ‘enmity’ . . . Gal.
5:19-21. But when our members no longer allow themselves to be
corrected by God and His Word, or care to follow after the saving
Gospel, we should not be surprised that the authorities are forced to
intervene ir our congregational affairs; if one comes to them with
complaints, they must decide; . . . therefore we cannot blame these high
authorities, or those who implement their decrees, but are ourselves to
blame that our congregations must be preserved through outside
compulsion. Thank God that those in power, in Russia too, need not be
feared because of our good, but only because of our evil deeds. He who
does not want to fear them need only do good and he will have their
praise.
“I was deeply grieved to find that discord and divisions had set in
even there where, for a time, one had been concerned to work for the
intellectual welfare of the people. 73 Should the Apostle Paul write to
those parties, he would probably say what he said to the Galatians: ‘Oh
you foolish Mennonites! . . .’ [Gal. 3:1,3]. If the heathen, to whom you
have sent the Word of God, were to look upon your discord, would they
not say in astonishment: ‘Is that the salvation-bringing fruit of the
Gospel?’ It is because of you that the name of God is being blasphemed
among them [the Mennonites] who, with a blind zeal, are opposed to our
participation in bringing the Word of God to the non-Christian peoples. I
am not against missionary activity, for I myself am a member of a
society without, however, giving up any part of my confession. . . .
“I have, in a few words, described the impressions I gained of the
conditions there. ... I did not mean to imply with this that the
church was more decadent there than here; not at all. . . . The thing that
justifies a joyous hope for the future in me is that one finds a longing for
peace nearly everywhere among them
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…