← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 155 (not an original page number)
Unit 155 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Russia have taken
upon themselves the duty ... to be examples in their occupations and in
their daily life ... to the surrounding neighbors. This is nothing less
than to pursue such goals in the building of their villages, roads,
gardens, groves, buildings, ... in farming as will enhance their conduct,
conform to their confession of faith, so that the authorities appointed
over them can at all times set them up as an example to the other
settlers.
“It is easy to see that if this is to be achieved the whole matter
needs leadership. But who shall take over the leadership of external
affairs? The ministry? No. When, according to Acts 6, the number of the
disciples increased, the apostles said: ‘It is not right etc.’ ... As a
§61(2)
154
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
consequence they chose men to fulfill this service; similarly it would be
advantageous to the council of ministers if men could be found in its
midst who would, through regulations and example, accept this
leadership role. In spite of this the ministry’s duty is to instill the Word
of God— ‘every man be subject to the powers that be’— into young and
old alike through instruction and exhortation. ‘He who resists the
authorities resists what God has appointed,’ Rom. 13. ‘Be subject for the
Lord’s sake to every human institution,’ I Peter 2: 13, so that also in this
matter a life in keeping with our confession . . . may be manifested! Had
we worked toward this goal during the last thirty or so years, I do not
believe that such sad discord, as that in existence today, would have
arisen. It is distressing to note that currently there is occasional
opposition to that which is contained in the charter of privileges and
desired by the crown. We want to be a quiet, obedient people whose ‘yes'
is still a ‘yes’ in lieu of an oath. Whoever opposes the orders of the higher
authorities not only stands in opposition to God’s command but also
breaks his ‘yes’ given in place of an oath! If those, who complain that it
is difficult to fulfill all those regulations— whose proceeds flow back into
their own coffers— had been here when the army was called up shortly
after I returned home and had also witnessed how women and mothers
wept hopelessly ; ... or if they should be placed on an equal footing with
their surrounding neighbors, they would be happy and thankful for the
duties that have been placed upon them as Mennonite-Russian subjects.
Where one enjoys extraordinary privileges, extraordinary achievements
should follow. . . .
“Concerning the disorders in the congregations, or between the
congregations, in general, it appears to me that many people put a
greater emphasis upon the outward form than the hidden life with Christ
in God, out of which arises a dead orthodoxy rather than a living
awareness of what it means to be a member of the body of Christ. Even
though some differences may be present among the congregations, the
walls separating them must not be
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…