← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 161 (not an original page number)
Unit 161 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
following
letter.
b) “Honorable Sir! Most respected elder and pastor!
“With the last mail I received a letter from His Illustrious Lordship,
the Prince of Czartorysky, together with a gold medal intended for
yourself, most noble sir, asking me to convey the latter to you in the
name of the emperor. I acquit myself of this obligation with the more joy
since this proof of His Majesty’s , and my most gracious Lord’s good
will toward you, honorable and deserving sir, is long over-due and is
simply to be considered a deserving reward for the outstanding
ecclesiastical organization which you, noble sir, instituted here in New
Russia 76 in 1794. Please accept, most noble sir, my hearty best wishes
for this imperial distinction, and be assured of the constant very high
160
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
regard and upright attachment I have toward you, and with which I
have the honor to be
your obedient servant,
(signed) L. v. Trefurt.”
[The Imperial Russian
representative to the
government of the then
free city of Danzig.]
Danzig, April 23/May 4, 1804
[According to Warkentin’s letter of thanks.]
“To the elder of the Mennonite Church, Pastor Warkentin of
Rosenort” [in Prussia near Elbing]. The same issue of the Rundschau
also carried Warkentin’s response— and letter of thanks to the Tsar,
signed: “May 18, 1804, Rosenort . . . Cornelius Warkentin.” The same
issue also carries an excerpt from his diary concerning the trip:
c) “On 77 June 15 [1794], the Lord’s Supper was served in Chortiz
[more correctly: Chortitza] to 233 communicants. The introductory
message was based on Psalm 3, the message on I Cor. 11:23: ‘For I
received from the Lord. . . On the 19th the Lord’s Supper was served in
Neuendorf to 173 persons and on the 20th I delivered a preparatory
sermon for the Communion Service in Kronsweide. 78 A youth, quite ill
during my stay there, was baptized, during which many tears were shed.
The Lord’s Supper was celebrated on the 22nd, something that had not
been done in this congregation for a period of five years [that is since the
settlement in 1789!]. For various reasons a brotherhood meeting was
held in Chortitza on the 23rd. . . . After the communion service in
Neuenburg, Peter Dyck was once more unanimously elected to the
ministry. [The same thing was done in Chortitza] . . . where David
Giesbrecht and Gerhard Ensz were elected. On the 25th I preached in
Kronsweide. Even though only an election to the ministry was to be
held, many people had assembled in the hope that I would preach. So I
spoke on Luke 19:10 about God’s great love toward mankind. After the
sermon the election took place: Heinrich Arndt, Franz Bannmann and
Cornelius v. Riesen were called. A deacon was also elected. The following
Sunday I took my leave from this congregation, at which everyone
melted into tears. On the 19th I gave my farewell address in Chortitza
before a large gathering, including the Lord Director [of the colony,
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…