← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 170 (not an original page number)
Unit 170 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
have arisen in the Lutheran Church, have
produced a different evaluation of ordination. [Luther, the presbyter,
ordained a bishop for the Naumburg diocese (Nikolas von Amsdorf)
‘without salt, fat, tar or grease,’ that is, without anointing oil or the
ceremonies of the Catholic Church; cf. the Calwer Church Lexicon and
Plitt and Petersen, Martin Luther. . . .] The pietistic system of
collegiality viewed it as an indifferent [as an ‘introduction’ to every
appointment to a parish], repeatable ceremony without any intrinsic
significance or corresponding effect. Indeed, well into our own century
(as the Wuerttemberg Church to 1855, for example), entire [Lutheran]
territorial churches have not practiced ordination except as an introduction
[an ‘induction’: a blessing with the laying on of hands whenever a
pastor takes over a new parish . . .]. Ordination is not necessary for
salvation, nor is it necessary in order to make the official acts of the
minis ter and his administration of the means of grace efficacious, as
though the latter could not otherwise be effective [as the Catholic Church
teaches]; it is necessary, however, to maintain good order within the
church and its service, to maintain the awareness amongst the members
of the church that the ministerial office is instituted by God and invested
with godly authority, and to maintain the awareness among the
ministers that they are servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries
of God and therefore accountable to God. From the very inception of the
Lutheran Church, the power to ordain has been in the hands of the
superintendent [the ‘main overseer,’ in Russia— the provost: the
‘Superior’], who can draw other church officers as witnesses and
assistants into his service, but who can also have an ordinary minister
substitute for him and entrust to him the power to ordain. [In the
Mennonite churches the highest or final authority quite naturally lies
only and alone with the ‘brotherhood.’]” II. From the Calwer Church
Lexicon of 1905, vol. 2, page 310: . . According to the original
Reformation point of view, as well as that of the symbolical books (the
Augustana articles XIV), only a person duly appointed [by the
Mennonites— elected by the brotherhood] to a pastorate [the position of
Documentary Supplement
173
elder or minister] is entitled to administer the means of grace, nor is a
special ordination necessary for this. It is true, of course, that in order to
have been duly appointed to a ministerial position one must be confirmed
by the church authorities [the decisive authority among the Mennonites
is the brotherhood. . . .]
The following Protestant churches of episcopal polity claim apostolic
succession: 1) The Anglican (state church) of England; 2) The Lutheran
Churches of Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, Sweden) and Russian-
Finland (but not as necessary to salvation); 3) The Moravian Brethren
(although many consider their succession to be very d
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…