← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 169 (not an original page number)
Unit 169 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
er "Reformers,” who had
also only been consecrated as “priest” (presbyters), and not as
“bishops,” according to the Roman and Greek rites. As is well-known,
the Catholic churches delegate the right and the power of consecration
only to the bishops as successors to the apostles, and not to the
presbyters. (Most) of the Protestants, especially the Reformed Church,
the Presbyterians, Congregationalists (free Presbyterians or Indepen-
dents) and the Baptists (which have broken away from the Independents,
as these have broken away from the Presbyterians), assert, however,
that the office of bishop (overseer) and presbyter (elder) is one and the
same office. These churches only differentiate between the office of elder
and bishop (as synonymous) and that of deacon (helper) in the church,
and the terms, elder, presbyter, minister, pastor, etc., simply designate a
rank and are identical with “bishop”; even though one of them may be
the presiding officer (that is, the first overseer, first bishop: “primus
inter pares”— the first amongst equals). In the document of the
Molotschna Mennonite Church Council of Elders (cf. below, #108ff.) the
idea is clearly expressed that only the elders are “bishops” and can
ordain— as "successors” (heirs) of the apostles— and that the ministers
or teachers are not even presbyters in the full Catholic sense of the word,
since they can neither baptize nor administer the Lord’s Supper, but only
preach, marry and bury. The Mennonite system, therefore, is an
“episcopalian” system with three ranks: that of elder (as full bishops),
ministers or teachers (not full presbyters) and deacons. (The M.B.
Church is more correct in this regard: cf. above, If 4, e). The Mennonites
of Swiss and South German descent differentiate between full servant,
servant of the Book (or “Word”) and deacon. The American Mennonites
readily use the term bishop.
What of the importance or meaning of ordination or commissioning?
For Menno’s views on this matter, see above, 04, e, footnote, and 015 a
and b and footnote; see also "The Old Testament in the Mennonite
Brethren Church,” 096 and 198fi.
172
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
It may be of interest to learn to know the concepts regarding
ordination as they are used in the Protestant churches. (The Roman,
Greek and other Catholic Churches, as is well known, recognize only one
office as having been handed down in a proven manner— by the laying on
of hands of one bishop to another in an unbroken line of succession back
to the apostles: the "apostolic succession.”) We quote: I. From the
strongly denominational Lutheran Church Lexicon by Carl Meusel,
Ph.D., vol. 5, Leipzig: Justus Nauman, 1897— page 71: “. . . [It] follows,
on the one hand, that the Reformation . . . had to break with the Catholic
idea of priestly consecration as a sacrament; on the other hand, however,
the various theories regarding ecclesiastical offices and differing views
regarding church law, which
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…