← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 182 (not an original page number)
Unit 182 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
trees; 32,730 willows and forest trees.
Buildings: 476 residences; two churches; twenty-two windmills; one
watermill; three groats mills; one beer brewery; one brandy distillery.
186
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
Silk industry: silk produced in the homes to the amount of thirteen
pounds and 210 grams, and on the plantation (Rosental), eight pounds
and eighty grams. Price per pound was fifteen rubles.
Artisans: two watchmakers; nine wood turners; ten coopers;
eighty-eight cabinet makers; twenty-six carpenters; sixteen blacksmiths;
forty-nine weavers; one painter; twenty -five tailors; twenty cobblers
and as many millers, oil press workers, distillers and brewers as there
were establishments.
2. The "New Colony" [Molotschna District ] from 1807 to 1817
(Supplement to HH 33 and 56)
a) At the break of day [writes a traveller 99 coming from Orechov
via Tokmak in 1807] we came around a mountain and caught sight of
the six houses that bear the name Prischib. This is the home of the
inspector of the Molotschna colonies, at present the young Baron
Uexkuell, who had studied in Germany. He very oblingingly afforded us
the opportunity to look around this region so suited to grain and
vegetable growing. On the right bank of the Molotschna lie the colonies
founded by the Wuerttembergers, the Germans, the Poles, the West
Prussians, the Hessians [from Nassau], and the East and South
Prussians [the so-called Molotschna Colonial District, most heavily
populated by Lutherans and some Catholics].
b) In order to acquaint ourselves with the conditions pertaining in
the colony we first drove to Tokmak where the annual fair was just being
held. A bridge is built over the arm of the river here which leads to the
first Mennonite colonies. Driving from one to the other, we visited
eighteen settlements in three days and were received with pleasure by this
diligent and industrious little group of people. Because they have only
begun to develop this region since 1805 [1804!], the Mennonites had not
yet begun to engage in those handicrafts which were not absolutely
essential. Their houses, barns, granaries, gardens and fields witness to
their love of order and industry. They had come with their own wagons,
some of them being drawn by from five to seven of their own horses,
carrying such beautiful furniture as: chests, closets, chairs, tables,
bedsteads made of walnut wood, so that their homes were quite
appealing. Many had sold their property [in Prussia] for thirty to forty
thousand guilders, and each one could proudly affirm that he had paid
his ten percent emigration dues honestly. Sixty -three of the 322 families
had not accepted the advance money offered by the Russian government,
and what is more, eighty-nine families had each brought from ten to
twenty thousand ducats in cash with them with which they now
supported their poorer brethren. [Many very poor families followed later,
partially funded by the Prussian congregation
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…