← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 183 (not an original page number)
Unit 183 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
s. Among the descendants
Documentary Supplement
187
of these poor emigrants, who often pushed or pulled their own small
wagons, many now belong to the wealthiest Mennonites in Russia.] In
the two [three] years since they had arrived, they were able to finish
most of their homes. This, indeed, leaves a very positive impression of
their activity, especially if one remembers what is involved in building
such homes in this country. Already these industrious people own
well-built windmills equipped to bag flour. Because of the absence of a
market, the flour, which we found to be white and finely ground, is still
only used in their own homes. They brought a load of butter to Taganrog
which was so eagerly bought up that they immediately saw to it that two
more shipments were sent. Livestock inventory: these Mennonites not
only brought many cattle, horses and sheep along with them from
Prussia, but also breeding stock. Even though their women preferred the
sheep brought from Prussia because of their longer wool, they have
nevertheless received [from the crown] seven Spanish [Merino] rams and
five ewes from Odessa. In order to improve their strain, they want to
acquire 140 large white Russian sheep for purposes of cross-breeding.
Regrettably, many sheep were stolen. It is too bad there is a total
absence of timber. Not even a wild shrub on the Molotschna River. They
have to attempt to get the lumber they need from the Dnieper, some
sixty to seventy versts away. The Sea of Azov is approximately the
same distance removed. However, nature has seen to it that they will
never suffer a shortage of fuel for burning, since the grass of the steppes
grows so lush and so tall that one can barely make his way through it [O
where has that grass gone to!]; moreover, a type of bulrush grows in the
river that can be used for fuel. [Soon they also began to use manure,
pressed into bricks, for fuel, which continues to this day.] All of them
assert that they are quite satisfied, and if only they were finished with
their initial arrangements they would turn their hand to the arts and
crafts. [Freely used.]
c) The same traveller, from whom most of number 1 was taken,
writes the following about Molotschna between 1817 and 1820. The land,
which is level here, is considered more fertile than that of the Old Colony.
Nevertheless, aside from that which has been planted, not even a tree or
shrub can be found. Every effort is made to remedy this situation by
planting trees. Farming is carried on the same way here as in the Old
Colony. Anim al husbandry, however, appears easier because there is a
better supply of grass and water. And yet this colony has suffered more
from anim al diseases than the old one. Now they have provided the
so-called “Tschumacken” [Russian oxen drivers], to whom they ascribe
the transmission of the disease, with a special road [the “salt road”] so
that they dare no longer make contact with the colony. Cattl
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…