← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 189 (not an original page number)
Unit 189 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
mentary Supplement
193
accordance with his Christian duty.” For this reason he could not be
made a member of any order 106 and elevated into the nobility along with
it, because people were then of the opinion that if one left the Mennonite
farming communities one ceased to be a Mennonite. He requested that
all medals given him be “without ribbons or decorations”— hies lienty i
uschka. A former president of the Supervisory Commission in Odessa,
State Councillor, Privy Councillor and Senator von Hahn, who, as
Comies’ superior and friend, knew him intimately as the result of a
long-standing correspondence and personal contact, attested of him :
“Comies was a unique man. He possessed a keen mind and was, in every
regard, a practical advisor. We have him to thank for the beautiful
woods that lie like an oasis in the desert around the Molotschna Colony.”
(According to Unruh, Klaassen and others.)
2. The Agricultural Society, a) A long period of preparation
preceded the creation of the Agricultural Society of 1830. Since Johann
Comies was its soul (not only during his lifetime, but through the power
of his ideas continues in this capacity to this day, just as the Mennonite
brotherhood of Dutch-Prussian origin still bears the religious imprint of
Menno’s fundamental ideas), the Agricultural Society had already
existed some thirteen years prior to its formal organization and naming,
indeed it had existed as long as had Comies’ model farm at Juschanle.
Associations had long since proven their worth in the Molotschna
Mennonite area: the Ohrloff “School Association,” with Comies as the
central figure, the Bible Society, and the Literary Society. The founding
charter grants the society, later known as the “A.S.,” the status of
a “free academy!” This designation was not regarded too noble for
an institution consisting of Mennonite farmers which had Comies
as its central driving force. The occasion for the creation of a society
with the status or character of a “free academy,” which, in tune with
the times, was granted strong powers of command and execution
by the highest authorities, came from a wish expressed by Tsar
Alexander I in Steinbach upon seeing the successfully planted groves of
trees especially in that village (founded by Klaas Wiens, Molotschna’s
first colonial administrator) and Juschanlee. Fr anz Isaak, a former
Ohrloff minister, writes regarding this noble visit and the founding
of the Agricultural Society: “The extent to which the government
was concerned to expedite and bring to fruition the Mennonite
responsibility of being a model in work and conduct can be seen by
the fact that His Majesty Tsar Alexander I visited the colonies in
1818 [cf #64 ] and 1825, which inspired the inhabitants to go about
their work with joy and courage; for they saw him face to face who was,
in so large a measure, the promoter of their well-being. His gracious
condescension to enter many of the homes and his friendly
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…