← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 190 (not an original page number)
Unit 190 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
fatherly
194
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
encouragement filled the community with a joyous confidence, and silent
prayers to God and tears of gratitude followed sifter the much-loved
father of the country. It was His Majesty’s concern that experiments be
carried out in this, at that time, virtually treeless region [excluding the
groves already planted] with plantations of trees. And on his last journey
he expressed, in Steinbach, his desire that every fanner plant a half
dessiatine with trees. In order to fulfill His Majesty’s most high wish,
Lord Contenius entertained the idea to create a society for this important
branch of agriculture. ... In 1830, the year of his death, von Insov, the
Supervisor-General of [all] the colonies, confirmed the "Society for the
Furtherance of Forestry, Gardening and Wine Production.” Johann
Comies was named as its life-long chairman. Later the title of the society
was expanded to include: “to Improve Agriculture and Industry.” From
1843 onwards, the Molotschna school system has also come under its
jurisdiction by legal charter [expressly in accord with the general school
laws of the colony and in co-operation with the spiritual leaders 107 for
the greatest possible benefit to all the schools], and once again its title was
expanded to include: “and Improvement of the School System.” Thus this
“society modelled after the free academies” with strong executive powers
became the only truly all-encompassing Department of Culture for all of
the Russian Mennonites; the Chortitza region was granted a similar
Agricultural Society, where Comies, as a “plenipotentiary of all
Mennonites” and later as special deputy of the government, also
exercised a considerable authority. In the latter position his jurisdiction
reached to the Prischib District and the “Swedish Colony” on the
Dnieper; because of his expertise he visited the Kherson (Grosslieben-
taler) colonies; he was appointed, as we already know, supervisor of the
Nogai (as well as the Doukhobors and Molokans) and Jews (settlers in
the Province of Kherson): the Mennonite model farmers and supervisors
in the Jewish colonies were responsible to the agricultural societies of
Molotschna and Chortitza. Already in the 1820s he journeyed to
the territory of the nomadic tribes of the Kalmuks at the request of their
Supervisor, Faddiiev, in order to advise them on their permanent
settlement!
b) The eighteen-year period of the society’s history with Comies at
its head is an exceedingly important chapter in the colonies’ one-
hundred-year existence. Its first goal was to plant trees. However, not
only did it spear-head the planting of forests and gardens, but its
activity was extended to the following areas: the planting of hedges, of
the beautiful tree-lanes from village to village; the four-field system of
land cultivation with summer-fallow (every fourth year) ; the damming of
water ponds for purposes of watering cattle and irrigating th
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…