← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 19 (not an original page number)
Unit 19 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
in the issue of Waldensian origins; I have merely
cited the observations of Menno, Deknatel, Reiswitz and Wadzeck, the
Hutterian Brethren, etc. I had neither the space nor the learned
tools— and hence the courage— to investigate the discoveries of Dr.
Ludwig Keller in this regard. But then the general Anabaptist history
merely constitutes the “frame of reference.”
May the God of my life, Who in His grace allowed me to write this
book, accompany it out into our small Mennonite world and anywhere
else He may wish. In His perfection, might, and wisdom He will allow it
to be useful as it is, where and how His holy Majesty sees fit. In His
grace He will turn away any damage which it might bring because of its
shortcomings. I bow myself in humility, adoration, and thanks before
Him, my eternal Father.
P. M. Friesen
A
THE ORIGINS OF THE MENNONITE
MOVEMENT
i.
THE FORMATION OF THE OLD EVANGELICAL BROTHERHOOD
KNOWN AS ANABAPTISTS OR MENNONITES
1. We present here the most essential material concerning the origin § 1
of the church of our fathers according to a rare, small publication, written
for and co mmis sioned by the Prussian Mennonites, which was edited by
two non-Mennonites and bore the title: Beitraege zur Kenntnis der
Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Europa und Amerika (Contributions for the
Understanding of the Mennonite Churches in Europe and America). It
was edited and published by Baron von Reiswitz and Professor Wadzeck
in Berlin in 1821. Ours is a free and abridged rendering with occasional
supplementary material taken from other sources. Whenever we quote
directly, this is indicated by the use of quotation marks: . . .”
a) “A significant number of evangelical family heads [Reiswitz and
Wadzeck begin p. I] 1 were called Re-Baptizers, Baptists or Anabaptists
in Germany. Since these names have come to carry spiteful connotations,
however, it would appear to be more proper ... to identify them as
Mennonites (or Anabaptists), naming them after one of their respectable
teachers, the gentle Menno Simons, because they differ from other
Christians primarily in the doctrine concerning infant baptism.”
b) According to Reiswitz and Wadzeck, the origin of this Christian
group is shrouded in obscurity. Their own members assert, and in this
they are supported by the researches of the most prominent church
historians, that these origins are hidden in the earliest beginnings of the
good Waldensians, who sought refuge in Europe’s most remote valleys
(Savoy, Lombardy, etc.) in order to escape a frightful persecution. Yet
they did not abandon the truth once they had recognized it. Who has not
heard of the quiet, simple, devout sons of Peter Waldo, 2 the forerunner
of Wycliffe, John Hus and Luther? When Luther and the others initiated
the Reformation, the descendants of these Waldensians also took
courage and openly witnessed to the truth.
1
2
ORIGINS
c) Reiswitz and Wadzeck insist that the Mennoni
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…