← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 20 (not an original page number)
Unit 20 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
tes remained aloof
from the horrors of the Peasants’ War, Thomas Muentzer’s hordes and
the Muenster Anabaptists [1525-1535], [their entire subsequent history
proves this]. Menno Simons, one of their most important teachers
explained that he and his friends had never consented to such folly and
horror: "No one can honestly accuse me of ever having given assent to
the teachings of the Muensterites. Rather, I have continuously striven
against them secretly and openly through the spoken as well as the
written word for more than seventeen years. We do not recognize those
as our brothers and sisters who reject the cross of Christ, despise the
Lord’s Word and embrace worldly vices under the pretense of a moral
conduct, as the Muensterites did.”
d) Leading church historians have asserted that it was undoubtedly
primarily because the Muensterites also rejected infant baptism that the
friends of Menno were mistakenly identified with them. Concerning this
Menno writes most appropriately: "If our accusers wish to assert that
just because we have been baptized with the same baptism [as adults] as
the Muensterites, that we are therefore also to be included with them in
one body and community, then we answer: If the outward baptism does
indeed have such significance, then they [our opponents] need to ask
themselves what kind of community they have, for it is well known
that even adulterers, murderers and others have received the same
baptism as they have.”
e) Reiswitz and Wadzeck rightly surmise that it is possible that
many descendants of the peace-loving Waldensians, during the general
religious unrest of those times, regarded the Muensterites 2 3 and related
fanatics as brothers, but later turned from them in disgust.
f) Widespread and furious persecutions led by the established
churches arose against the peaceful Anabaptist followers of Menno
Simons in every country ; and because the persecuted did not bear arms,
they were readily robbed, hunted down and murdered by their enemies.
They were the lambs which endure and suffer patiently. (Cf. below III:
“Persecutions.”)
2. In a strictly confessional Lutheran publication by Dr. Karl
Meusel entitled Kirchliches Handlexikon, Vol. 4, p. 549, we read: ". . . It
is not correct to say that the Mennonites descended from the
Muensterites, if for no other reason than that their beginnings reach _
farther back than the Muensterites, even though both movements can
partially be traced back to a common origin. The Anabaptist congrega-
tion at Bockholt in 1536 [the year of Menno's baptism] revealed
differences between the Obbenites, as they were called at that time [after
Obbe Phillips who ordained Menno], and the Muensterites as well as the
Menno Simons
3
Melchiorites. They agreed only in their common rejection of infant
baptism. A diametrical antithesis between the Muensterites and
Obbenites emerged above all in their doctrine of the kingdom of God:
whereas the fo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…