← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 191 (not an original page number)
Unit 191 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e valleys
(balka) of the steppes; improving the breed of cattle; developing the silk
industry which had thrived for several decades (the “Silk Society;”
Documentary Supplement
c) Heinrich Franz, Sr.
d) PhiUpp Wlebe
b) Heinrich Heese, Sr.
b) Johann Cornies, Sr.
Cornies Monument in Ohrioff.
ffc- V-
> '■ * K i' ■
■j
rewarding good spinners and caterpillar breeders); improving and
beautifying the style of buildings while m akin g them more fireproof; the
planning of new model colonies and possible regulation of the old ones ;
erecting planned school houses; setting up wise and just regulations for
domestic servants; the supervision of neglected children and their care
by turning them over to model childless couples or families with few
children who would train them until they came of age; in putting lazy
adults to work; the improvement of morals and manners amongst the
inhabitants; and massive improvement of the school system were all
fruits of its labors (primarily, though not only) in the Molotschna
Mennonite colonies.
c) How strong and deeply religious (mostly in a misunderstood
maimer) the initial opposition to the society was can be seen from the
closing poem of a religious speech given by a very prominent minister in
Documentary Supplement
197
1847 in which Comies is personified as the “enemy and oppressor” of the
faithful guardians “of religion” and considered the destroyer of “true
religion.” The sharp edge, indeed the essential power of this opposition
was lost with the departure of Elder Heinrich Wiens in 1847 and the
death of the chairman Johann Comies in 1848. How tenacious and
furious this opposition was in its day is demonstrated, among many
other anecdotes, by the following true story, verified by narration of an
older married daughter and the grey-haired son-in-law of the said
opponent of Comies and his society, both of whom (daughter and
son-in-law) we have known to be sincere Christians for years. A farmer
and village mayor of a Molotschna colony reported repeatedly that the
trees, planted “according to the specifications," instead of growing, all
died. In the specific written instructions on how to plant the trees, it had
never entered Comies mind to state that the roots had to be placed in the
ground and the branches in the air! Finally the “society,” in the person
of two to three representatives, as often happened, came to the village
mayor T in the village of F in order to investigate the matter at first
hand. The mayor led the “society” into the garden and sure enough, all
the trees, planted in well-prepared soil, stood with their bone-dry roots
in the air and their branches in the ground. The representatives abruptly
turned around and left. The Mennonite sense of honor suffered terribly
under the consequences : the congregation concerned, a part of the large
congregation, was informed by the Agriculture Society of this fact,
verified it,
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…