Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 193 (not an original page number)

Unit 193 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
lords of the French Assembly with regard to their major religious concerns because of their “meekness,” so did the strict lords of the Society and the Supervisory Co mmis sion indulge what seems to us the small-minded religious concerns of our Kleine Gemeinde brethren. “The meek shall inherit the earth!” The yards, fields, gardens and cattle of the Kleine Gemeinde belonged to the best in the colonies. And the honorable Franz Isaak, who lived in those days, asserts that chairman Johann Comies, who was involved in a major battle with Jakob Warkentin and Heinrich Wiens in 1842 and 1847 (did he have to carry it out in the manner he did?), in 1843 convinced the government to grant the Kleine Gemeinde equal status with the other churches! d) Now, did Johann Comies never make any mistakes? "Who amongst us does not make mistakes!” Did Menno not make mistakes? (“The marriage ban,” etc.). Have our favorites, such as Pastor Wuest, Bernhard Fast, August Lenzmann, Bernhard Harder, Johann Claassen, Abraham Unger, and the favorites of others not made mistakes? Have not “Ohrloff,” “Gnadenfeld,” the “Kleine Gemeinde,” the “Large Congregation” and the “M.B. Church” made mistakes? “All of us have sinned— and come short” (of perfection). In the lawful position assigned him by the highest authorities Johann Comies was, in his own way and under the circumstances of the time, a small scale version of that which world history has called the “enlightened despot,” a dictator who rules for the benefit of his subjects: Duke Ernst the Pious of Gotha, Peter the Great, Frederick II, and Joseph II. Such idealistic men of power perform Documentary Supplement 199 great feats but also commit great mistakes! 110 Comies also made mistakes. He was probably not without guilt in the Gnadenfeld matter (F. Lange) or in the matter concerning Elder H. Wiens. 111 The good he has accomplished, however, by far outweighs his mistakes, and we honor him ardently for his accomplishments. We agree with what Johann Claassen 112 said to his brethren: “It is self-evident that we must be model farmers in return for all of the imperial privileges!” (Compare also the letter of Rev. Johann Wall #62, 2). We believe everyone must be a model in his given occupation; and where this is not the case, it is a double sin and shame to us,— may it irritate you and me! Menno and Comies have given us Russian Mennonites, both in Russia and America, our ecclesiastical and cultural character for all time; as yet, however, it is far from perfect! We see in Comies’ reform the healthy body (culture and civic co mmuni ty) for Menno 's spirit (the heart of Christianity and church community). And we call upon our more than a hundred-thousand brothers and sisters in Russia and America: Let us remember our two teachers, Menno and Corniest Let us acquire what we have inherited from our fathers! (According to A. Kroeker’s Family Almanac of 1900, M.F.S. and P.W.M.) e) The chai

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…