← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 193 (not an original page number)
Unit 193 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
lords of the French Assembly with regard to
their major religious concerns because of their “meekness,” so did the
strict lords of the Society and the Supervisory Co mmis sion indulge what
seems to us the small-minded religious concerns of our Kleine Gemeinde
brethren. “The meek shall inherit the earth!” The yards, fields, gardens
and cattle of the Kleine Gemeinde belonged to the best in the colonies.
And the honorable Franz Isaak, who lived in those days, asserts that
chairman Johann Comies, who was involved in a major battle with
Jakob Warkentin and Heinrich Wiens in 1842 and 1847 (did he have to
carry it out in the manner he did?), in 1843 convinced the government to
grant the Kleine Gemeinde equal status with the other churches!
d) Now, did Johann Comies never make any mistakes? "Who
amongst us does not make mistakes!” Did Menno not make mistakes?
(“The marriage ban,” etc.). Have our favorites, such as Pastor Wuest,
Bernhard Fast, August Lenzmann, Bernhard Harder, Johann Claassen,
Abraham Unger, and the favorites of others not made mistakes? Have
not “Ohrloff,” “Gnadenfeld,” the “Kleine Gemeinde,” the “Large
Congregation” and the “M.B. Church” made mistakes? “All of us have
sinned— and come short” (of perfection). In the lawful position assigned
him by the highest authorities Johann Comies was, in his own way and
under the circumstances of the time, a small scale version of that which
world history has called the “enlightened despot,” a dictator who rules for
the benefit of his subjects: Duke Ernst the Pious of Gotha, Peter the
Great, Frederick II, and Joseph II. Such idealistic men of power perform
Documentary Supplement
199
great feats but also commit great mistakes! 110 Comies also made
mistakes. He was probably not without guilt in the Gnadenfeld matter
(F. Lange) or in the matter concerning Elder H. Wiens. 111 The good he
has accomplished, however, by far outweighs his mistakes, and we honor
him ardently for his accomplishments. We agree with what Johann
Claassen 112 said to his brethren: “It is self-evident that we must be
model farmers in return for all of the imperial privileges!” (Compare also
the letter of Rev. Johann Wall #62, 2). We believe everyone must be a
model in his given occupation; and where this is not the case, it is a
double sin and shame to us,— may it irritate you and me! Menno and
Comies have given us Russian Mennonites, both in Russia and America,
our ecclesiastical and cultural character for all time; as yet, however, it is
far from perfect! We see in Comies’ reform the healthy body (culture and
civic co mmuni ty) for Menno 's spirit (the heart of Christianity and church
community). And we call upon our more than a hundred-thousand
brothers and sisters in Russia and America: Let us remember our two
teachers, Menno and Corniest Let us acquire what we have inherited
from our fathers! (According to A. Kroeker’s Family Almanac of 1900,
M.F.S. and P.W.M.)
e) The chai
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…