← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 194 (not an original page number)
Unit 194 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
rmen of the Agricultural Society of the Molotschna until
the division of the Molotschna Mennonite District into those of
Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld (later “volosts”) known to us were: Johann
Comies, Philipp Wiebe (his son-in-law and secretary), David Comies (his
brother) and Peter Sc hmi dt of Steinbach, whose name, after that of
Comies, was most synonymous with that of the “Society,” standing for
everything that was wise, noble and powerful, 113 as we remember it from
the years of our childhood.
f) After the division of the Molotschna Mennonite District into
those of Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld, then called the Halbstadt and
Gnadenfeld Volosts, the following were:
Chairman of the Halbstadt Agricultural Society: 1) Klaas Wiebe,
Muensterberg, 2) Heinrich Reimer, Ohrloff, 3) Johannes Wiebe (son of
Philipp Wiebe), Ohrloff, 4) Peter P. Neufeld, Liebenau (at the present—
1910).
Chairmen of the Gnadenfeld Agricultural Society: 1) Peter Schmidt,
Steinbach (the same as above), 2) Gerhard Fast, Rudnerweide, 3) Heinrich
Siebert, Conteniusfeld, 4) Peter Bergmann, Mariawohl, 5) David Unruh,
Gnadenfeld, 6) Abram Rempel, Gnadenfeld (at the present— 1910).
Well-known chairmen and members of the Chortitza Agricultural
Society were: Jakob Penner, formerly colony administrator, Franz Pauls,
Kronsweide, Heinrich Hildebrand, Einlage, Johann Siemens, David
Redekopp, Rosental, David Koop, Chortitza and Jakob Niebuhr,
Kronstal (died in 1880, and with him the society came to an end).
200
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
§69(2)
D. The Tsar's Gracious Letter of Acknowledgment and
Thanks for Cultural and Patriotic Achievements
Translation
a) To the Mennonite churches settled along the Molotschna River.
Upon testimony of the director of the third department of Crown Lands,
Privy Councillor v. Bradky, regarding the excellent order in which he
found the Mennonite colonies settled along the Molotschna River, I had
the good fortune of bringing the praiseworthy zeal of the Mennonites for
the improvement of agriculture and industry and for the establishment
of church order and domestic concerns, to the attention of His Majesty.
In consideration of the zeal of the Mennonite Church and in order to
encourage the same for future endeavors for the common good, it has
pleased the Lord Tsar, 114 on February 3, to order that His Majesty’s
gracious good wishes and acknowledgment be conveyed to the church.
After having received the ukase of the ruling senate in this regard, I
take pleasure in making known the said royal order to the Mennonite
Church. I am assured that the Mennonite colonists, who have been
considered worthy of this high token of the royal acknowledgment of
their efforts will, through new progress in the area of agriculture and
industry as well as the consolidation of order and morality, give me new
opportunity to bring this to the attention of His Majesty.
Minister of Crown Lands, Adjutant General Count Kisselev, March
13, 18
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…