← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 197 (not an original page number)
Unit 197 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
rated upon in what follows.
4. a) Outwardly, the Molotschna church scene took on the following §73
form in 1860: the “Large Congregation" had parishes in Lichtenau,
Petershagen, Margenau, Schoensee and Pordenau with Elders Duerk
Warkentin in Petershagen and Heinrich Toews in Pordenau. This group
comprised more than three quarters of the population 3 of the fifty-five
(58) villages 4 (and landed estates) of the “Molotschna Mennonite
District" (or area) in the District of Berdiansk, Taurida, with the
“Colony Administrative Office” in Halbstadt (actually Neu-Halbstadt)
and a mayoral office 5 at the head of every colony (village).
The Colony Administrative Office consisted of a colony adminis-
trator and two assistants elected for a period of three years, a hired
secretary and a few secretarial assistants. A mayor and two assistants,
also elected, filled every village office. Besides these there existed the
formerly very powerful “Agricultural Society” (a chairman, two vice
chairmen, and a recording secretary). For eighteen years (1848-1865) the
nearly all-powerful David Friesen of Halbstadt was colony administrator,
Peter Schmidt of Steinbach, where the office was located, for many years
the chairman of the society. All of the officials, with the exception of the
secretaries, were elected by majority vote by the farmers, that is, the
landowners, and had to be Mennonites.
All parishes were structured according to the desires of the members
who lived, accordingly as they saw fit, in any colony or even outside the
colonies on landed estates. An elder might live in one colony, where there
was a church, and yet not be active in it but in the church in another
place. (Franz Goerz, Jr., the Rudnerweide elder, for example, lived in
Gandenfeld.)
Every village had a one-room school ; Halbstadt had a one-classroom
intermediary, district, or secondary school to train school teachers or
secretaries, which later developed into a multi-room, and eventually into a
seven-room school (including the two-classroom model school and the
two pedagogical classes); Ohrloff had a one-room school run by a society
(later three rooms); Gnadenfeld and Steinbach each had a one-room
private school (the one in Gnadenfeld— compare above #52 “Brotherhood
204
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
School”— later became a three-room secondary school). The teachers of
these “advanced” schools, as they were respectfully called, were: Gustav
Rempel in Halbstadt, Hermann Janzen in Ohrloff, Heinrich Franz, Sr.,
and shortly after 1860, Johann and Friedrich Lange in Gandenfeld and
Peter Neufeld in Steinbach. Shortly after 1860, Heinrich Franz had his
own private school in Gnadenfled.
The members of the following congregations: Ohrloff-Halbstadt
(and since 1863 Neukirch) with Elder (Bernhardt Fast of Tiege, d. 1860,
and) Johann Harder of Blumenstein; Rudnerweide— Elder Benjamin
Ratzlaff in Rudnerweide, and since 1861 Franz Goerz of Gnadenfeld;
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…